When CEG-TEK’s DMCA notices contain duplicate titles. Purposeful luring of defendants or not?

Copyright Enforcement Group’s (“CEG-TEK Int’l”) DMCA letters have been sent out to thousands of would-be “John Doe” copyright infringement defendants to date for the alleged downloading of pornographic films. The problem is that they often ask for MULTIPLE SETTLEMENTS FOR THE SAME DOWNLOADED TITLE. BACKGROUND: Just in case you did not read my first article … Read more

The Tricky Problem in CEG-TEK’s New DMCA Scare Letters.

Bittorrent Evidence | TorrentLawyer Unversity Image to Designate Information-Only Articles

UPDATED 2020 SUMMARY: Copyright Enforcement Group (“CEG-TEK”) wreaked havok on the internet community with their CEG-TEK DMCA settlement letters (in 2012, I called them “DMCA scare letters” because their intent was to scare internet users into settling the claims against them. [Be sure to read my note at the bottom of this article for comments … Read more

MISSION ACCOMPLISHED? New York’s Split Southern District Court

It is very easy to put up a banner claiming “MISSION ACCOMPLISHED — NO MORE BITTORRENT CASES IN SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK,” but reality is not that simple. A judge can give a ruling, and it can be a darned good ruling which is binding on all other judges in that federal district (similarly, … Read more

THIRD DEGREE FILMS, INC. attorney perhaps facing a THIRD DEGREE FELONY.

Unauthorized Practice of Law is a big no-no in the legal world. With a bit of legal humor, as most of you now know, Judge Robert Hinkle of the Florida Northern District Court dismissed each and every one of Terik Hashmi’s cases today. As we discussed back in February, Judge Hinkle consolidated and froze all … Read more

Can Ira Siegel no longer accept settlements for his dismissed cases?

Please allow me to extend a warm congratulations to the Cashman Law Firm, PLLC defendants (and all others) who have been dismissed from the New Sensations, Inc. v. Does 1-1,474 (Case No. 3:11-cv-02770) case and the Patrick Collins, Inc. v. Does 1-2590 (Case No. 3:11-cv-02766) case, both in the U.S. District Court for the Northern … Read more

Exit mobile version