I have added this page for internet users who have been contacted by Jay McDaniel. The goal here is to open the lines of communication between accused internet users so that a person contacted by this firm can share with others what was said. It is also a good place to discuss the cases for which the McDaniel Law Firm (NJ) is the plaintiff attorney. Should you learn of any updates regarding one of his cases, please post it here using the following format — (e.g., “Century Media Ltd. v. Swarm Does 1-2,192 (Case No. 2:12-cv-03867) filed in the U.S. District Court for the District of New Jersey”). Please also feel free to post new cases you find on the http://www.rfcexpress.com website where McDaniel, his firm, or any of his local attorneys (if any) are listed as the plaintiff attorney.
Remember to please exercise discretion when posting (e.g., do not post your real name or e-mail address), and as usual, avoid using vulgar or offensive language (both towards McDaniel and towards other users).
To get more of an understanding of the McDaniel Law Firm NJ cases I have posted a few of the articles below to get you started:
The music industry is now coming after internet subscribers. (posted 9/11/12)
Which will be the bittorrent lawsuits of tomorrow? (posted 9/9/11)
New cases filed as of 9/13/12:
CASES FILED BY JAY R. MCDANIEL OF MCDANIEL LAW FIRM PC IN THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY:
Century Media Ltd. v. Swarm Does 1-2,192 (Case No. 2:12-cv-03867)
Century Media Ltd. v. Swarm Does 1-944 (Case No. 2:12-cv-03868)
Century Media Ltd. v. Swarm Does 1-225 (Case No. 2:12-cv-03869)
Century Media Ltd. v. Swarm Does 1-214 (Case No. 2:12-cv-03870)
Century Media Ltd. v. Swarm Does 1-77 (Case No. 2:12-cv-03911)
Century Media Ltd. v. Swarm Does 1-3,811 (Case No. 2:12-cv-03912)
CASES FILED BY JAY R. MCDANIEL OF MCDANIEL LAW FIRM PC IN NEW JERSEY:
Amselfilm Productions GmbH & Co. KG v. Swarm Does 1-997 (Case No. 2:12-cv-03864)
Amselfilm Productions GmbH & Co. KG v. Swarm Does 1-187 (Case No. 2:12-cv-03865)
Amselfilm Productions GmbH & Co. KG v. Swarm Does 1-3,470 (Case No. 2:12-cv-03866)