RECAP: MALIBU MEDIA, LLC APPEARS TO BE FOCUSING MOST OF THEIR FUNDS ON THREE OF THEIR ATTORNEYS WHO ARE FILING A MAJORITY OF THE LAWSUITS. THESE LAWSUITS ARE BEING FILED IN THE NEW YORK ‘TRI-STATE’ AREA (NY/NJ/CT) AND TEXAS.BUT, LAWSUITS FOR SOME NOTICEABLE “TERRITORIES” ARE STILL FILED BY OLDER MALIBU ATTORNEYS. I CALL THESE ATTORNEYS MEMBERS OF THE ‘OLD GUARD’.
WHO ARE MEMBERS OF THE ‘OLD GUARD’ ATTORNEYS LOYAL TO MALIBU MEDIA?
There are a few attorneys who stayed loyal to Malibu Media, LLC after they split from Keith Lipscomb. Jackie James, by the way, is one of them, and this is one of the reason she is likely being rewarded by Malibu Media giving her the ability to file over 300+ lawsuits, each lawsuit possibly pulling in $10,000-$25,000 in settlement dollars (of which she likely receives a ‘contingency fee’ in the form of commissions from each settlement). I estimate that in the past year, Jackie has made Malibu Media, LLC $4.5 Million Dollars in settlements, which means that she has likely grossed over $1 Million Dollars in commissions taken from the life savings hard-working New York (and now Connecticut) families in just ONE YEAR alone.
In New Jersey resides Patrick Cerillo (“Pat Cerillo”), one of the “old guard” of attorneys who were with Malibu Media, LLC since they started filing lawsuits. Pat has his law firm in New Jersey, and to date, he alone has personally filed 14% of all Malibu Media, LLC cases in 2017 (this amounts to 38 cases against John Doe Defendants). So as much as superstar Jackie would no doubt love to take over that lucrative territory, for now, she’s probably locked out of that territory.
Pat’s contact information is being listed here so that you can recognize his name as it is found on the subpoena area of the paperwork you receive from your ISP. It is almost NEVER a good idea to contact your plaintiff attorney directly.
PATRICK JOSEPH CERILLO 4 WALTER FORAN BLVD., SUITE 402 FLEMINGTON, NJ 08822 Email: [email protected]
JON HOPPE (MD)
There is one other name of someone I consider to be one of the upper ranks of the Malibu Media LLC “old guard,” and that is Jon Alexander Hoppe (“Jon Hoppe”).
Jon and I first spoke in March, 2012 when someone (possibly Jon, but my best guess with hindsight, Keith Lipscomb) filed an initial set of Malibu Media, LLC cases using his PACER account. It was this conversation that tipped me off that Lipscomb was likely filing the lawsuits using the PACER accounts of the various local attorneys, because when I first spoke to Jon and sent over a letter of representation for an early Malibu Media, LLC client, he did not even know that he filed my client’s case.
Jon Hoppe has since become one of the upper ranks of the Malibu Media attorneys.
At one point, I understood [from speaking to newer attorneys] that Jon Hoppe was the one “in charge” and “with authority to negotiate settlements for Malibu Media,” even though he had no connection to the lawsuits that were filed by other attorneys in the other states’ federal courts. In sum, Jon Hoppe still maintains control over the Maryland lawsuits, and to date, he has filed only seven (7) lawsuits. This would be a big deal if there were more lawsuits (Jon only filed a mere 3% of all Malibu Media cases filed in 2017), especially since Maryland is so close to Washington, DC where he has his law office.
Jon Hoppe’s information can be found below:
Jon Alexander Hoppe Law Offices of Jon A. Hoppe, Esquire 1050 Seventeenth Street, NW, Suite 1000 Washington, DC 20036 Email: [email protected]
It would not do justice to end the article here, but that is exactly what I am doing because I have made my point.
Thus, with the Malibu Media, LLC copyright holder, there appears to be an “old guard” and a “new guard” when it comes to ‘into which federal district courts a rising star can file John Doe lawsuits,’ and if there is a member of the “old guard” in place, the “new guard” may not enter his territory.
— FOR MORE INFORMATION ABOUT MALIBU MEDIA, LLC:Again, if you have been implicated as a John Doe defendant in a Malibu Media, LLC lawsuit, there are TWO (2) main articles you should read immediately:
CONTACT FORM: Alternatively, sometimes people just like to contact me using one of these forms. If you have a question or comment about what I have written, and you want to keep it *for my eyes only*, please feel free to use the form below. The information you post will be e-mailed to me, and I will be happy to respond.
NOTE: No attorney client relationship is established by sending this form, and while the attorney-client privilege (which keeps everything that you share confidential and private) attaches immediately when you contact me, I do not become your attorney until we sign a contract together. That being said, please do not state anything “incriminating” about your case when using this form, or more practically, in any e-mail.
Cases Filed in the Maryland District Court (7) Attorney: Jon Alexander Hoppe (“Jon Hoppe”) of the Law Office of Jon a Hoppe, Esquire
Malibu Media, LLC v. Doe (Case No. 8:17-cv-00397) Malibu Media, LLC v. Doe (Case No. 8:17-cv-00396) Malibu Media, LLC v. Doe (Case No. 1:17-cv-00402) Malibu Media, LLC v. Doe (Case No. 8:17-cv-00401) Malibu Media, LLC v. Doe (Case No. 1:17-cv-00398) Malibu Media, LLC v. Doe (Case No. 1:17-cv-00399) Malibu Media, LLC v. Doe (Case No. 8:17-cv-00400)
Cases Filed in the New Jersey District Court (38) Attorney: Patrick Joseph Cerillo (“Pat Cerillo”)
MALIBU MEDIA , LLC. v. JOHN DOE SUBSCRIBER ASSIGNED IP ADDRESS 24.0.207.93 (Case No. 2:17-cv-01239) MALIBU MEDIA, LLC v. JOHN DOE (Case No. 2:17-cv-01246) MALIBU MEDIA, LLC v. JOHN DOE (Case No. 2:17-cv-01251) MALIBU MEDIA, LLC v. JOHN DOE SUBSCRIBER ASSIGNED IP ADDRESS 100.1.206.172 (Case No. 2:17-cv-01172) MALIBU MEDIA, LLC v. JOHN DOE SUBSCRIBER ASSIGNED IP ADDRESS 108.167.50 (Case No. 2:17-cv-01185) MALIBU MEDIA, LLC v. JOHN DOE SUBSCRIBER ASSIGNED IP ADDRESS 108.5.52.134 (Case No. 2:17-cv-01182) MALIBU MEDIA, LLC v. JOHN DOE SUBSCRIBER ASSIGNED IP ADDRESS 108.53.147.136 (Case No. 2:17-cv-01183) MALIBU MEDIA, LLC v. JOHN DOE SUBSCRIBER ASSIGNED IP ADDRESS 108.53.252.54 (Case No. 2:17-cv-01193) MALIBU MEDIA, LLC v. JOHN DOE SUBSCRIBER ASSIGNED IP ADDRESS 173.3.124.255 (Case No. 2:17-cv-01228) MALIBU MEDIA, LLC v. JOHN DOE SUBSCRIBER ASSIGNED IP ADDRESS 173.3.54.44 (Case No. 2:17-cv-01232) MALIBU MEDIA, LLC v. JOHN DOE SUBSCRIBER ASSIGNED IP ADDRESS 173.63.249.136 (Case No. 2:17-cv-01233) MALIBU MEDIA, LLC v. JOHN DOE SUBSCRIBER ASSIGNED IP ADDRESS 173.70.197.251 (Case No. 2:17-cv-01234) MALIBU MEDIA, LLC v. JOHN DOE SUBSCRIBER ASSIGNED IP ADDRESS 173.70.93.127 (Case No. 2:17-cv-01236) MALIBU MEDIA, LLC v. JOHN DOE SUBSCRIBER ASSIGNED IP ADDRESS 67.82.37.90 (Case No. 2:17-cv-01252) MALIBU MEDIA, LLC v. JOHN DOE SUBSCRIBER ASSIGNED IP ADDRESS 67.83.64.114 (Case No. 2:17-cv-01271) MALIBU MEDIA, LLC v. JOHN DOE SUBSCRIBER ASSIGNED IP ADDRESS 67.83.77.86 (Case No. 2:17-cv-01272) MALIBU MEDIA, LLC v. JOHN DOE SUBSCRIBER ASSIGNED IP ADDRESS 69.117.66.98 (Case No. 3:17-cv-01261) MALIBU MEDIA, LLC v. JOHN DOE SUBSCRIBER ASSIGNED IP ADDRESS 69.118.248.215 (Case No. 2:17-cv-01273) MALIBU MEDIA, LLC v. JOHN DOE SUBSCRIBER ASSIGNED IP ADDRESS 69.122.18.0 (Case No. 2:17-cv-01275) MALIBU MEDIA, LLC v. JOHN DOE SUBSCRIBER ASSIGNED IP ADDRESS 69.141.237.206 (Case No. 3:17-cv-01262) MALIBU MEDIA, LLC v. JOHN DOE SUBSCRIBER ASSIGNED IP ADDRESS 72.82.239.77 (Case No. 3:17-cv-01265) MALIBU MEDIA, LLC v. JOHN DOE SUBSCRIBER ASSIGNED IP ADDRESS 72.88.211.121 (Case No. 2:17-cv-01279) MALIBU MEDIA, LLC v. JOHN DOE SUBSCRIBER ASSIGNED IP ADDRESS 73.10.138.235 (Case No. 3:17-cv-01266) MALIBU MEDIA, LLC v. JOHN DOE subscriber assigned IP address 73.199.240.186 (Case No. 3:17-cv-01229) MALIBU MEDIA, LLC v. JOHN DOE subscriber assigned IP address 96.248.95.37 (Case No. 3:17-cv-01268) MALIBU MEDIA, LLC v. JOHN DOE SUBSCRIBER IP ADDRESS 108.35.167.198 (Case No. 2:17-cv-01180) MALIBU MEDIA, LLC v. JOHN DOE SUBSCRIBER IP ADDRESS 108.53.193.228 (Case No. 2:17-cv-01188) MALIBU MEDIA, LLC v. JOHN DOE, SUBSCRIBER ASSIGNED IP ADDRESS 100.8.116.23 (Case No. 2:17-cv-01179) MALIBU MEDIA, LLC. v. JOHN DOE (Case No. 2:17-cv-01237) MALIBU MEDIA, LLC. v. JOHN DOE (Case No. 2:17-cv-01240) MALIBU MEDIA, LLC. v. JOHN DOE SUBSCRIBER ASSIGNED IP ADDRESS 69.124.120.156 (Case No. 2:17-cv-01276) MALIBU MEDIA, LLC. v. JOHN DOE SUBSCRIBER ASSIGNED IP ADDRESS 71.172.15.229 (Case No. 2:17-cv-01277) MALIBU MEDIA, LLC. v. JOHN DOE SUBSCRIBER ASSIGNED IP ADDRESS 73.160.218.175 (Case No. 2:17-cv-01307) MALIBU MEDIA, LLC. v. JOHN DOE SUBSCRIBER ASSIGNED IP ADDRESS 73.194.168.244 (Case No. 2:17-cv-01310) MALIBU MEDIA, LLC. v. JOHN DOE SUBSCRIBER ASSIGNED IP ADDRESS 73.197.106.118 (Case No. 2:17-cv-01315) MALIBU MEDIA, LLC. v. JOHN DOE SUBSCRIBER ASSIGNED IP ADDRESS 73.248.226.136 (Case No. 2:17-cv-01317) MALIBU MEDIA, LLC. v. JOHN DOE SUBSCRIBER ASSIGNED IP ADDRESS 76.116.108.250 (Case No. 2:17-cv-01319) MALIBU MEDIA, LLC. v. JOHN DOE SUBSCRIBER ASSIGNED IP ADDRESS 96.57.99.138 (Case No. 2:17-cv-01321)
— CONTACT FORM: If you have a question or comment about what I have written, and you want to keep it *for my eyes only*, please feel free to use the form below. The information you post will be e-mailed to me, and I will be happy to respond.
NOTE: No attorney client relationship is established by sending this form, and while the attorney-client privilege (which keeps everything that you share confidential and private) attaches immediately when you contact me, I do not become your attorney until we sign a contract together. That being said, please do not state anything “incriminating” about your case when using this form, or more practically, in any e-mail.
What else can you tell me about the Malibu Media cases?
[2017 UPDATE:] The best way to learn about Malibu Media, LLC is to read what happened to them as it happened. The list of stories below (in the order I listed them) tell the Malibu Media story in a way that you will understand them.
This $81,600 number itself is a bit interesting to me because in December, I wrote an article expressing my suspicions that “MALIBU MEDIA, LLC APPEARS TO BE ON A $20,000/MONTH FILING BUDGET.” In that article, I estimated that every 90 days, Malibu Media, LLC files roughly 100 new lawsuits, “like the breath of a dragon, or in in the spirit of their name, like the ebb and flow of the waves that crash across the Malibu shores.”
Since the last set of Malibu Media filings were in October 2016 and we have seen NO FILINGS from Malibu in the recent months of November, December, and January (90 days of SILENCE), it only makes sense that in February of 2017, we had a whole slew of lawsuits that flooded the courts.
How did I estimate Malibu Media would spend $20,000/month?
July = 75 filings x $400 per filing = $30,000 August = 59 filings x $400 per filing = $23,600 (-16 cases) September = ZERO FILINGS. (-75 cases) October = 109 filings x $400 per filing = $43.600 November = ZERO FILINGS. (-75 cases) December = ZERO FILINGS. (-75 cases) January = ZERO FILINGS. (-75 cases) February = 204 filings x $400 per filing = $81,600
Two items to note:
1) Malibu Media is SLIGHTLY UNDER BUDGET (which means that we should expect to see roughly 20 more cases in their next batch of filings).
2) Since the April 2016 breakup of Malibu Media, LLC and their former ‘mastermind’ Keith Lipscomb (who they sued for not sharing the settlement funds he ‘extorted’ from John Doe Defendants [harsh words, yes, but not the point of this article]), understanding how much money Malibu Media, LLC is spending can help us understand how much they expect to receive for that money.
What else can you tell me about the Malibu Media cases?
[2017 UPDATE] The best way to learn about Malibu Media, LLC is to read what happened to them as it happened. The list of stories below (in the order I listed them) tell the Malibu Media story in a way that you will understand them.
— FOR MORE INFORMATION ABOUT MALIBU MEDIA, LLC:Again, if you have been implicated as a John Doe defendant in a Malibu Media, LLC lawsuit, there are TWO (2) main articles you should read immediately:
CONTACT FORM: Alternatively, sometimes people just like to contact me using one of these forms. If you have a question or comment about what I have written, and you want to keep it *for my eyes only*, please feel free to use the form below. The information you post will be e-mailed to me, and I will be happy to respond.
NOTE: No attorney client relationship is established by sending this form, and while the attorney-client privilege (which keeps everything that you share confidential and private) attaches immediately when you contact me, I do not become your attorney until we sign a contract together. That being said, please do not state anything “incriminating” about your case when using this form, or more practically, in any e-mail.
MALIBU MEDIA, LLC APPEARS TO BE FOCUSING MOST OF THEIR FUNDS ON THREE OF THEIR ATTORNEYS WHO ARE FILING A MAJORITY OF THE LAWSUITS. THESE LAWSUITS ARE BEING FILED IN THE NEW YORK ‘TRI-STATE’ AREA (NY/NJ/CT) AND TEXAS.
WHICH ATTORNEYS ARE FILING MOST OF THE MALIBU MEDIA, LLC LAWSUITS?
Jacqueline M. James in NY/CT (78), Pat Cerillo in NJ (38) and Andrew Kumar / Michael Lowenberg of the Lowenberg Law Firm in TX (42).
What is the relevance of these three attorneys?
JACQUELINE JAMES (NY, CT)
Jacqueline James (“Jackie”) has been filing lawsuits for Malibu Media, LLC since 2015. She is not one of the “original” copyright trolls (Malibu Media, LLC has been filing lawsuits since 2/20/2012 [based on my first contact with them]). However, Jackie is more than willing to start fights with judges and other attorneys, and she has needed to change how she files her lawsuits and how she interacts with John Doe Defendants and even how she treats other attorneys because she has developed a reputation where the word “harassment” has been thrown around more than a few times.
2018 UPDATE: Jackie James is no longer representing Malibu Media, LLC. While we were opponents on many cases, I did get to know her (as much as was possible). In hindsight, she has always been tough when negotiating a settlement, but she has always been fair (to the extent any of these cases are “fair”). The biggest change in my view of her happened when she stopped representing Malibu Media, LLC. Malibu has many issues, and in my opinion, they suffer from a lack of a moral compass. My view of Jackie changed for the better when I learned that she decided to no longer represent Malibu as their attorney. That was no doubt a lot of “business” to give up, and given the circumstances, she did it in the best way possible. After she left, Kevin Conway happily took over each of her cases, and is now Malibu Media’s NY / CT attorney.
These days, Jackie has taken on Malibu Media LLC’s “sister” as a client — Strike 3 Holdings, LLC. The lawsuits are almost identical to Malibu’s, however, of the two companies, Strike 3 Holdings appears to be run significantly more “ethically” than the Malibu cases are. This is not to say that Strike 3 Holdings, LLC is not engaging in copyright trolling — they are — however, their “tactics” are much more friendly than what I have even heard in recent months since she has stopped representing Malibu Media LLC.
I am listing Jackie’s information here just so you can recognize her name on the subpoena area of the paperwork you receive from your ISP. It is almost NEVER a good idea to contact your plaintiff attorney directly:
Jacqueline M. James The James Law Firm PPLC 445 Hamilton Avenue Suite 1102 White Plains, NY 10601 Email: [email protected]
2018 UPDATE: To keep things up to date, I am also now listing Kevin Conway’s information here so that you will recognize his name on the subpoena paperwork. Again, it is never a good idea to speak to the plaintiff attorney directly:
Kevin T. Conway, Esq. 664 Chestnut Ridge Road Spring Valley, NY 10977 E-mail: [email protected]
ANDREW KUMAR / MICHAEL LOWENBERG (TX)
Andrew Kumar and Michael Lowenberg are a different type of Malibu Media, LLC copyright troll attorneys. Andrew and Mike became one of Malibu Media, LLC’s local counsel at the end of 2016 (“fresh meat,” so to speak), and my best guess is that they were hired by Malibu Media directly, or by Carl Crowell who has taken over the role of managing each and every Malibu Media, LLC lawsuit across the U.S. (I say this because the entity behind Malibu Media, LLC is Guardaley [a german company], and now they are working with Carl Crowell to replace Keith Lipscomb after their relationship with Lipscomb soured in April, 2016). Andrew and Mike both are too “new” to the Malibu Media lawsuits to have gained a reputation yet, but nevertheless, our Texas federal judges have allowed them free reign to file 75+ lawsuits without much of an objection.
2018 UPDATE: It must have been a coincidence that I wrote about both Jackie James (NY) and Andrew Kumar / Michael Lowenberg (TX) in the same article. Likely for the same reasons that Jackie James stopped representing Malibu Media, LLC, I saw similar tensions arising between these two and Malibu Media, LLC as well. Even though I called them on it and asked them what was going on behind the scenes, and although they appeared jaded by what was happening at Malibu, they denied that there was a problem.
Out of nowhere, one day I learned that they too were no longer representing Malibu Media, LLC. In their place is Malibu Media’s new local counsel, Paul Beik. As of updating this article, I do not yet have an opinion of Paul. [05/2019 UPDATE: Now I do have an opinion of Paul Beik.] Beik came in as a Malibu Media, LLC local counsel for our Texas cases after the big changes happened with Malibu Media, LLC. Paul seems to be comfortable with the new “rules” and this is not a positive for him, as Malibu Media, LLC has gotten a lot worse over the last few months.
Andrew and Mike’s contact information is being listed here so that you can recognize their names as it they found on the subpoena area of the paperwork you receive from your ISP (you will usually find one name, or the other). Again — it is almost NEVER a good idea to contact your plaintiff attorney directly.
Andrew Darshan Kumar Michael J. Lowenberg Lowenberg Law Firm 7941 Katy Fwy., #306 Houston, TX 77024 Email: [email protected]
Paul Beik’s contact information is being listed here so that you can recognize his name as it is found on the subpoena area of the paperwork you receive from your ISP.
Paul S. Beik Beik Law Firm, PLLC 8100 Washington Avenue, Suite 1000 Houston, Texas 77007 E-mail: [email protected]
WHY ISN’T JACKIE JAMES FILING THE NEW JERSEY MALIBU MEDIA CASES?
Although Jacqueline James and Andrew Kumar / Mike Lowenberg (and now Paul Beik) each belong to a “new generation” of Malibu Media, LLC copyright infringement attorneys (“copyright trolls”), there are still a set of OLDER, MORE EXPERIENCED MALIBU MEDIA, LLC ATTORNEYS (I call them the “OLD GUARD”), some of whom stayed loyal to Malibu Media, LLC when their relationship with Lipscomb went sour. In New Jersey, Patrick Cerillo (or, “Pat Cerillo”) is one of those older attorneys who remained loyal to Malibu Media, LLC.
PATRICK CERILLO (NJ)
Patrick J. Cerillo is one of the “old guard” of attorneys who stayed loyal to Malibu Media, LLC after they split from Keith Lipscomb. He resides in New Jersey. So as much as Jackie James would no doubt love to take over the New Jersey Malibu Media, LLC cases, for now, Pat Cerillo has a “lock” on that territory.
Patrick’s contact information is being listed here so that you can recognize his name as it is found on the subpoena area of the paperwork you receive from your ISP. Again — it is almost NEVER a good idea to contact your plaintiff attorney directly.
PATRICK JOSEPH CERILLO 4 WALTER FORAN BLVD., SUITE 402 FLEMINGTON, NJ 08822 Email: [email protected]
Why is me being licensed in New York relevant to you?
Because these courts are in my home turf. Before moving our Cashman Law Firm, PLLC lawfirm to Houston, TX in 2010, I was (and continue to be) licensed to practice law in New York. I grew up in New York, I went to law school in New York, I know many federal judges in New York, and I understand the way the federal courts operate in that state. I have lived in both New York and New Jersey most of my life, and the “tri-state area” (NY/NJ/CT) is where I have most of my legal contacts.
Why is me being licensed in Texas relevant to you?
Because as of 2010, we moved our Cashman Law Firm, PLLC practice to Houston, TX. Since we opened our doors, we have practiced *ALMOST EXCLUSIVELY* in federal court practice. I took the bar exam here, I have represented possibly hundreds of clients here in Texas exclusively for bittorrent-based copyright infringement lawsuits, and again, I know the federal judges here, how their courts operate, and this is my home turf.
What else can you tell me about the Malibu Media cases?
The best way to learn about Malibu Media, LLC is to read what happened to them as it happened. The list of stories below (in the order I listed them) tell the Malibu Media story in a way that you will understand them.
CONTACT FORM: Alternatively, sometimes people just like to contact me using one of these forms. If you have a question or comment about what I have written, and you want to keep it *for my eyes only*, please feel free to use the form below. The information you post will be e-mailed to me, and I will be happy to respond.
NOTE: No attorney client relationship is established by sending this form, and while the attorney-client privilege (which keeps everything that you share confidential and private) attaches immediately when you contact me, I do not become your attorney until we sign a contract together. That being said, please do not state anything “incriminating” about your case when using this form, or more practically, in any e-mail.
Here is the breakdown of Malibu Media, LLC cases filed THIS YEAR, 2017! (sorted by attorney/quantity):
Attorney Jackie James Filed Cases (28%) Connecticut (38 Cases) New York (40 Cases)
Attorneys Andrew Kumar & Michael Lowenberg Filed Cases (16%) Texas (42 Cases)
Attorney Pat Cerillo Filed Cases (14%) New Jersey (38 Cases)
Attorney Joel Bernier Filed Cases (6%) Michigan (MIED) (16 Cases)
Attorney Mary Schulz Filed Cases (4%) Illinois (ILND) (12 Cases)
Attorney Jon Hoppe Filed Cases (3%) Maryland (7 Cases)
Attorney Jordan Rushie Filed Cases (3%) Pennsylvania (PAED) (8 Cases)
Attorney John Decker Filed Cases (1%) Virginia (VAED) (3 Cases)
LIST OF MALIBU CASES FILED TO DATE (2017 CASES ONLY)
Cases in the Connecticut District Court (38) Attorney: Jacqueline M. James (“Jackie James”) of The James Law Firm, PPLC
Malibu Media, LLC v. Doe (Case No. 3:17-cv-00187) Malibu Media, LLC v. Doe (Case No. 3:17-cv-00188) Malibu Media, LLC v. Doe (Case No. 3:17-cv-00189) Malibu Media, LLC v. Doe (Case No. 3:17-cv-00190) Malibu Media, LLC v. Doe (Case No. 3:17-cv-00195) Malibu Media, LLC v. Doe (Case No. 3:17-cv-00203) Malibu Media, LLC v. Doe (Case No. 3:17-cv-00213) Malibu Media, LLC v. Doe (Case No. 3:17-cv-00219) Malibu Media, LLC v. Doe (Case No. 3:17-cv-00220) Malibu Media, LLC v. Doe (Case No. 3:17-cv-00221) Malibu Media, LLC v. Doe (Case No. 3:17-cv-00223) Malibu Media, LLC v. Doe (Case No. 3:17-cv-00224) Malibu Media, LLC v. Doe (Case No. 3:17-cv-00225) Malibu Media, LLC v. Doe (Case No. 3:17-cv-00227) Malibu Media, LLC v. Doe (Case No. 3:17-cv-00229) Malibu Media, LLC v. Doe (Case No. 3:17-cv-00230) Malibu Media, LLC v. Doe (Case No. 3:17-cv-00232) Malibu Media, LLC v. Doe (Case No. 3:17-cv-00233) Malibu Media, LLC v. Doe (Case No. 3:17-cv-00249) Malibu Media, LLC v. Doe (Case No. 3:17-cv-00250) Malibu Media, LLC v. Doe (Case No. 3:17-cv-00251) Malibu Media, LLC v. Doe (Case No. 3:17-cv-00252) Malibu Media, LLC v. Doe (Case No. 3:17-cv-00253) Malibu Media, LLC v. Doe (Case No. 3:17-cv-00254) Malibu Media, LLC v. Doe (Case No. 3:17-cv-00256) Malibu Media, LLC v. Doe (Case No. 3:17-cv-00257) Malibu Media, LLC v. Doe (Case No. 3:17-cv-00258) Malibu Media, LLC v. Doe (Case No. 3:17-cv-00259) Malibu Media, LLC v. Doe (Case No. 3:17-cv-00271) Malibu Media, LLC v. Doe (Case No. 3:17-cv-00272) Malibu Media, LLC v. Doe (Case No. 3:17-cv-00273) Malibu Media, LLC v. Doe (Case No. 3:17-cv-00274) Malibu Media, LLC v. Doe (Case No. 3:17-cv-00275) Malibu Media, LLC v. Doe (Case No. 3:17-cv-00276) Malibu Media, LLC v. Doe (Case No. 3:17-cv-00277) Malibu Media, LLC v. Doe (Case No. 3:17-cv-00278) Malibu Media, LLC v. Doe (Case No. 3:17-cv-00279) Malibu Media, LLC v. Doe (Case No. 3:17-cv-00280)
Cases Filed in the Illinois Northern District Court (12) Attorney: Mary K. Schulz of the Media Litigation Firm, P.C.
Malibu Media, LLC v. Doe, subscriber assigned IP address 208.59.138.51 (Case No. 1:17-cv-01183) Malibu Media, LLC v. Doe, subscriber assigned IP address 24.14.89.147 (Case No. 1:17-cv-01190) Malibu Media, LLC v. Doe, subscriber assigned IP address 50.172.197.139 (Case No. 1:17-cv-01195) Malibu Media, LLC v. Doe, subscriber assigned IP address 67.175.128.50 (Case No. 1:17-cv-01196) Malibu Media, LLC v. Doe, subscriber assigned IP address 73.168.198.228 (Case No. 1:17-cv-01197) Malibu Media, LLC v. Doe, subscriber assigned IP address 73.74.242.152 (Case No. 1:17-cv-01200) Malibu Media, LLC v. Doe, subscriber assigned IP address 75.27.62.75 (Case No. 1:17-cv-01201) Malibu Media, LLC v. Doe, subscriber assigned IP address 75.28.181.87 (Case No. 1:17-cv-01202) Malibu Media, LLC v. Doe, subscriber assigned IP address 76.231.75.139 (Case No. 1:17-cv-01206) Malibu Media, LLC v. Doe, subscriber assigned IP address 98.206.219.205 (Case No. 1:17-cv-01210) Malibu Media, LLC v. Doe, subscriber assigned IP address 98.227.75.40 (Case No. 1:17-cv-01396) Malibu Media, LLC v. Doe, subscriber assigned IP address96.95.112.34 (Case No. 1:17-cv-01209)
Cases Filed in the Maryland District Court (7) Attorney: Jon Alexander Hoppe (“Jon Hoppe”) of the Law Office of Jon a Hoppe, Esquire
Malibu Media, LLC v. Doe (Case No. 8:17-cv-00397) Malibu Media, LLC v. Doe (Case No. 8:17-cv-00396) Malibu Media, LLC v. Doe (Case No. 1:17-cv-00402) Malibu Media, LLC v. Doe (Case No. 8:17-cv-00401) Malibu Media, LLC v. Doe (Case No. 1:17-cv-00398) Malibu Media, LLC v. Doe (Case No. 1:17-cv-00399) Malibu Media, LLC v. Doe (Case No. 8:17-cv-00400)
Cases Filed in the Michigan Eastern District Court (16) Attorney: Joel A. Bernier of Sheikh Legal Services PLLC 176 S. Main St., Suite 1, Mount Clemens, MI 48043 ([email protected])
MALIBU MEDIA, LCC v. John Doe (Case No. 2:17-cv-10422) MALIBU MEDIA, LCC v. JOHN DOE subscriber assigned IP ) Address 107.4.109.143 (Case No. 2:17-cv-10426) MALIBU MEDIA, LCC v. JOHN DOE subscriber assigned IP ) Address 107.4.109.143 (Case No. 5:17-cv-10426) MALIBU MEDIA, LCC v. JOHN DOE subscriber assigned IP Address 68.32.2.28 (Case No. 2:17-cv-10432) MALIBU MEDIA, LCC v. JOHN DOE subscriber assigned IP Address 68.49.201.228 (Case No. 2:17-cv-10442) MALIBU MEDIA, LCC v. JOHN DOE subscriber assigned IP Address 68.49.243.199 (Case No. 2:17-cv-10443) MALIBU MEDIA, LCC v. JOHN DOE subscriber assigned IP Address 68.49.243.199 (Case No. 2:17-cv-10445) MALIBU MEDIA, LCC v. JOHN DOE subscriber assigned IP Address 68.55.89.28 (Case No. 2:17-cv-10444) MALIBU MEDIA, LCC v. JOHN DOE subscriber assigned IP Address 68.55.89.28 (Case No. 4:17-cv-10444) MALIBU MEDIA, LCC v. JOHN DOE subscriber assigned IP Address 68.56.223.52 (Case No. 2:17-cv-10446) MALIBU MEDIA, LCC v. JOHN DOE subscriber assigned IP Address 68.56.223.52 (Case No. 2:17-cv-10447) MALIBU MEDIA, LCC v. JOHN DOE subscriber assigned IP Address 68.60.174.21 (Case No. 2:17-cv-10448) MALIBU MEDIA, LCC v. JOHN DOE subscriber assigned IP Address 98.209.250.195 (Case No. 2:17-cv-10449) MALIBU MEDIA, LCC v. JOHN DOE subscriber assigned IP Address 98.224.223.170 (Case No. 2:17-cv-10450) MALIBU MEDIA, LCC v. JOHN DOE subscriber assigned IP Address 99.37.173.71 (Case No. 2:17-cv-10451) MALIBU MEDIA, LLC v. JOHN DOE subscriber assigned IP Address 68.40.27.99 (Case No. 2:17-cv-10441)
Cases Filed in the New Jersey District Court (38) Attorney: Patrick Joseph Cerillo (“Pat Cerillo”)
MALIBU MEDIA , LLC. v. JOHN DOE SUBSCRIBER ASSIGNED IP ADDRESS 24.0.207.93 (Case No. 2:17-cv-01239) MALIBU MEDIA, LLC v. JOHN DOE (Case No. 2:17-cv-01246) MALIBU MEDIA, LLC v. JOHN DOE (Case No. 2:17-cv-01251) MALIBU MEDIA, LLC v. JOHN DOE SUBSCRIBER ASSIGNED IP ADDRESS 100.1.206.172 (Case No. 2:17-cv-01172) MALIBU MEDIA, LLC v. JOHN DOE SUBSCRIBER ASSIGNED IP ADDRESS 108.167.50 (Case No. 2:17-cv-01185) MALIBU MEDIA, LLC v. JOHN DOE SUBSCRIBER ASSIGNED IP ADDRESS 108.5.52.134 (Case No. 2:17-cv-01182) MALIBU MEDIA, LLC v. JOHN DOE SUBSCRIBER ASSIGNED IP ADDRESS 108.53.147.136 (Case No. 2:17-cv-01183) MALIBU MEDIA, LLC v. JOHN DOE SUBSCRIBER ASSIGNED IP ADDRESS 108.53.252.54 (Case No. 2:17-cv-01193) MALIBU MEDIA, LLC v. JOHN DOE SUBSCRIBER ASSIGNED IP ADDRESS 173.3.124.255 (Case No. 2:17-cv-01228) MALIBU MEDIA, LLC v. JOHN DOE SUBSCRIBER ASSIGNED IP ADDRESS 173.3.54.44 (Case No. 2:17-cv-01232) MALIBU MEDIA, LLC v. JOHN DOE SUBSCRIBER ASSIGNED IP ADDRESS 173.63.249.136 (Case No. 2:17-cv-01233) MALIBU MEDIA, LLC v. JOHN DOE SUBSCRIBER ASSIGNED IP ADDRESS 173.70.197.251 (Case No. 2:17-cv-01234) MALIBU MEDIA, LLC v. JOHN DOE SUBSCRIBER ASSIGNED IP ADDRESS 173.70.93.127 (Case No. 2:17-cv-01236) MALIBU MEDIA, LLC v. JOHN DOE SUBSCRIBER ASSIGNED IP ADDRESS 67.82.37.90 (Case No. 2:17-cv-01252) MALIBU MEDIA, LLC v. JOHN DOE SUBSCRIBER ASSIGNED IP ADDRESS 67.83.64.114 (Case No. 2:17-cv-01271) MALIBU MEDIA, LLC v. JOHN DOE SUBSCRIBER ASSIGNED IP ADDRESS 67.83.77.86 (Case No. 2:17-cv-01272) MALIBU MEDIA, LLC v. JOHN DOE SUBSCRIBER ASSIGNED IP ADDRESS 69.117.66.98 (Case No. 3:17-cv-01261) MALIBU MEDIA, LLC v. JOHN DOE SUBSCRIBER ASSIGNED IP ADDRESS 69.118.248.215 (Case No. 2:17-cv-01273) MALIBU MEDIA, LLC v. JOHN DOE SUBSCRIBER ASSIGNED IP ADDRESS 69.122.18.0 (Case No. 2:17-cv-01275) MALIBU MEDIA, LLC v. JOHN DOE SUBSCRIBER ASSIGNED IP ADDRESS 69.141.237.206 (Case No. 3:17-cv-01262) MALIBU MEDIA, LLC v. JOHN DOE SUBSCRIBER ASSIGNED IP ADDRESS 72.82.239.77 (Case No. 3:17-cv-01265) MALIBU MEDIA, LLC v. JOHN DOE SUBSCRIBER ASSIGNED IP ADDRESS 72.88.211.121 (Case No. 2:17-cv-01279) MALIBU MEDIA, LLC v. JOHN DOE SUBSCRIBER ASSIGNED IP ADDRESS 73.10.138.235 (Case No. 3:17-cv-01266) MALIBU MEDIA, LLC v. JOHN DOE subscriber assigned IP address 73.199.240.186 (Case No. 3:17-cv-01229) MALIBU MEDIA, LLC v. JOHN DOE subscriber assigned IP address 96.248.95.37 (Case No. 3:17-cv-01268) MALIBU MEDIA, LLC v. JOHN DOE SUBSCRIBER IP ADDRESS 108.35.167.198 (Case No. 2:17-cv-01180) MALIBU MEDIA, LLC v. JOHN DOE SUBSCRIBER IP ADDRESS 108.53.193.228 (Case No. 2:17-cv-01188) MALIBU MEDIA, LLC v. JOHN DOE, SUBSCRIBER ASSIGNED IP ADDRESS 100.8.116.23 (Case No. 2:17-cv-01179) MALIBU MEDIA, LLC. v. JOHN DOE (Case No. 2:17-cv-01237) MALIBU MEDIA, LLC. v. JOHN DOE (Case No. 2:17-cv-01240) MALIBU MEDIA, LLC. v. JOHN DOE SUBSCRIBER ASSIGNED IP ADDRESS 69.124.120.156 (Case No. 2:17-cv-01276) MALIBU MEDIA, LLC. v. JOHN DOE SUBSCRIBER ASSIGNED IP ADDRESS 71.172.15.229 (Case No. 2:17-cv-01277) MALIBU MEDIA, LLC. v. JOHN DOE SUBSCRIBER ASSIGNED IP ADDRESS 73.160.218.175 (Case No. 2:17-cv-01307) MALIBU MEDIA, LLC. v. JOHN DOE SUBSCRIBER ASSIGNED IP ADDRESS 73.194.168.244 (Case No. 2:17-cv-01310) MALIBU MEDIA, LLC. v. JOHN DOE SUBSCRIBER ASSIGNED IP ADDRESS 73.197.106.118 (Case No. 2:17-cv-01315) MALIBU MEDIA, LLC. v. JOHN DOE SUBSCRIBER ASSIGNED IP ADDRESS 73.248.226.136 (Case No. 2:17-cv-01317) MALIBU MEDIA, LLC. v. JOHN DOE SUBSCRIBER ASSIGNED IP ADDRESS 76.116.108.250 (Case No. 2:17-cv-01319) MALIBU MEDIA, LLC. v. JOHN DOE SUBSCRIBER ASSIGNED IP ADDRESS 96.57.99.138 (Case No. 2:17-cv-01321)
Cases Filed in the New York Eastern District Court (10) Attorney: Jacqueline M. James (“Jackie James”) of The James Law Firm, PPLC
Malibu Media, LLC v. DOE (Case No. 2:17-cv-01079) Malibu Media, LLC v. DOE (Case No. 2:17-cv-01078) Malibu Media, LLC v. DOE (Case No. 2:17-cv-01084) Malibu Media, LLC v. DOE (Case No. 2:17-cv-01077) Malibu Media, LLC v. DOE (Case No. 2:17-cv-01083) Malibu Media, LLC v. DOE (Case No. 2:17-cv-01076) Malibu Media, LLC v. DOE (Case No. 2:17-cv-01081) Malibu Media, LLC v. DOE (Case No. 2:17-cv-01080) Malibu Media, LLC v. DOE (Case No. 2:17-cv-01075) Malibu Media, LLC v. DOE (Case No. 2:17-cv-01082)
Cases Filed in the New York Southern District Court (30) Attorney: Jacqueline M. James (“Jackie James”) of The James Law Firm, PPLC
Malibu Media, LLC v. Doe (Case No. 1:17-cv-00983) Malibu Media, LLC v. Doe (Case No. 1:17-cv-00985) Malibu Media, LLC v. Doe (Case No. 1:17-cv-00987) Malibu Media, LLC v. Doe (Case No. 1:17-cv-00988) Malibu Media, LLC v. Doe (Case No. 1:17-cv-00989) Malibu Media, LLC v. Doe (Case No. 1:17-cv-00992) Malibu Media, LLC v. Doe (Case No. 1:17-cv-00994) Malibu Media, LLC v. Doe (Case No. 1:17-cv-00995) Malibu Media, LLC v. Doe (Case No. 1:17-cv-01065) Malibu Media, LLC v. Doe (Case No. 1:17-cv-01067) Malibu Media, LLC v. Doe (Case No. 1:17-cv-01068) Malibu Media, LLC v. Doe (Case No. 1:17-cv-01069) Malibu Media, LLC v. Doe (Case No. 1:17-cv-01070) Malibu Media, LLC v. Doe (Case No. 1:17-cv-01072) Malibu Media, LLC v. Doe (Case No. 1:17-cv-01074) Malibu Media, LLC v. Doe (Case No. 1:17-cv-01075) Malibu Media, LLC v. Doe (Case No. 1:17-cv-01076) Malibu Media, LLC v. Doe (Case No. 1:17-cv-01078) Malibu Media, LLC v. Doe (Case No. 1:17-cv-01088) Malibu Media, LLC v. Doe (Case No. 1:17-cv-01094) Malibu Media, LLC v. Doe (Case No. 1:17-cv-01095) Malibu Media, LLC v. Doe (Case No. 1:17-cv-01096) Malibu Media, LLC v. Doe (Case No. 1:17-cv-01097) Malibu Media, LLC v. Doe (Case No. 1:17-cv-01098) Malibu Media, LLC v. Doe (Case No. 1:17-cv-01099) Malibu Media, LLC v. Doe (Case No. 1:17-cv-01100) Malibu Media, LLC v. Doe (Case No. 1:17-cv-01101) Malibu Media, LLC v. Doe (Case No. 1:17-cv-01102) Malibu Media, LLC v. Doe (Case No. 7:17-cv-00981) Malibu Media, LLC v. Doe (Case No. 7:17-cv-00982)
Cases Filed in the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court (8) Attorney: A. Jordan Rushie (“Jordan Rushie”) of Flynn Wirkus Young PC / Rushie Law
MALIBU MEDIA, LLC v. JOHN DOE (Case No. 2:17-cv-00662) MALIBU MEDIA, LLC v. DOE (Case No. 2:17-cv-00509) MALIBU MEDIA, LLC v. DOE (Case No. 2:17-cv-00506) MALIBU MEDIA, LLC v. JOHN DOE (Case No. 2:17-cv-00510) MALIBU MEDIA, LLC v. JOHN DOE (Case No. 2:17-cv-00508) MALIBU MEDIA, LLC v. JOHN DOE (Case No. 2:17-cv-00507) MALIBU MEDIA, LLC v. JOHN DOE (Case No. 2:17-cv-00512) MALIBU MEDIA, LLC v. JOHN DOE (Case No. 2:17-cv-00511)
Cases Filed in the Texas Southern District Court (42) Attorney: Andrew Darshan Kumar (“Andrew Kumar”) and Michael J. Lowenberg (“Mike Lowenberg”) of the Lowenberg Law Firm
Malibu Media, LLC v. Doe (Case No. 4:17-cv-00413) Malibu Media, LLC v. Doe (Case No. 4:17-cv-00415) Malibu Media, LLC v. Doe (Case No. 4:17-cv-00417) Malibu Media, LLC v. Doe (Case No. 4:17-cv-00418) Malibu Media, LLC v. Doe (Case No. 4:17-cv-00420) Malibu Media, LLC v. Doe (Case No. 4:17-cv-00421) Malibu Media, LLC v. DOE (Case No. 4:17-cv-00422) Malibu Media, LLC v. Doe (Case No. 4:17-cv-00423) Malibu Media, LLC v. Doe (Case No. 4:17-cv-00424) Malibu Media, LLC v. Doe (Case No. 4:17-cv-00425) Malibu Media, LLC v. Doe (Case No. 4:17-cv-00465) Malibu Media, LLC v. Doe (Case No. 4:17-cv-00466) Malibu Media, LLC v. Doe (Case No. 4:17-cv-00468) Malibu Media, LLC v. Doe (Case No. 4:17-cv-00469) Malibu Media, LLC v. Doe (Case No. 4:17-cv-00470) Malibu Media, LLC v. Doe (Case No. 4:17-cv-00471) Malibu Media, LLC v. Doe (Case No. 4:17-cv-00472) Malibu Media, LLC v. Doe (Case No. 4:17-cv-00473) Malibu Media, LLC v. Doe (Case No. 4:17-cv-00474) Malibu Media, LLC v. Doe (Case No. 4:17-cv-00475) Malibu Media, LLC v. Doe (Case No. 4:17-cv-00476) Malibu Media, LLC v. DOE (Case No. 4:17-cv-00477) Malibu Media, LLC v. Doe (Case No. 4:17-cv-00478) Malibu Media, LLC v. Doe (Case No. 4:17-cv-00479) Malibu Media, LLC v. Doe (Case No. 4:17-cv-00480) Malibu Media, LLC v. DOE (Case No. 4:17-cv-00481) Malibu Media, LLC v. Doe (Case No. 4:17-cv-00482) Malibu Media, LLC v. DOE (Case No. 4:17-cv-00483) Malibu Media, LLC v. Doe (Case No. 4:17-cv-00484) Malibu Media, LLC v. Doe (Case No. 4:17-cv-00485) Malibu Media, LLC v. DOE (Case No. 4:17-cv-00486) Malibu Media, LLC v. Doe (Case No. 4:17-cv-00487) Malibu Media, LLC v. Doe (Case No. 4:17-cv-00488) Malibu Media, LLC v. DOE (Case No. 4:17-cv-00489) Malibu Media, LLC v. Doe (Case No. 4:17-cv-00490) Malibu Media, LLC v. Doe (Case No. 4:17-cv-00491) Malibu Media, LLC v. DOE (Case No. 4:17-cv-00492) Malibu Media, LLC v. Doe (Case No. 4:17-cv-00493) Malibu Media, LLC v. DOE (Case No. 4:17-cv-00494) Malibu Media, LLC v. Doe (Case No. 4:17-cv-00495) Malibu Media, LLC v. Doe (Case No. 4:17-cv-00497) Malibu Media, LLC v. DOE (Case No. 4:17-cv-00498)
Cases Filed in the Virginia Eastern District Court (3) Attorney: John Carlin Decker, II (“John Decker”) of the Law Office of John C. Decker II 5207 Dalby Lane, Burke, VA 22015 (John is still using his Verizon e-mail when he files the lawsuits — [email protected])
Malibu Media, LLC v. Doe (Case No. 1:17-cv-00192) Malibu Media, LLC v. Doe (Case No. 1:17-cv-00193) Malibu Media, LLC v. Doe (Case No. 1:17-cv-00194)
What else can you tell me about the Malibu Media cases?
[2017 UPDATE] The best way to learn about Malibu Media, LLC is to read what happened to them as it happened. The list of stories below (in the order I listed them) tell the Malibu Media story in a way that you will understand them.
— FOR MORE INFORMATION ABOUT MALIBU MEDIA, LLC:Again, if you have been implicated as a John Doe defendant in a Malibu Media, LLC lawsuit, there are TWO (2) main articles you should read immediately:
CONTACT FORM: Alternatively, sometimes people just like to contact me using one of these forms. If you have a question or comment about what I have written, and you want to keep it *for my eyes only*, please feel free to use the form below. The information you post will be e-mailed to me, and I will be happy to respond.
NOTE: No attorney client relationship is established by sending this form, and while the attorney-client privilege (which keeps everything that you share confidential and private) attaches immediately when you contact me, I do not become your attorney until we sign a contract together. That being said, please do not state anything “incriminating” about your case when using this form, or more practically, in any e-mail.
A few weeks ago, I noticed that there was a shift in the locations where Malibu Media, LLC was filing their cases. Cases began to shift into Ohio (OHND, OHSD), Virginia (VAED), and Pennsylvania (PAED) federal courts (courts which I refer to as “safe haven” courts because of past rulings by judges who allowed Malibu’s cases to proceed unhindered), however I did not understand why.
It was only until a recent conversation with one of Malibu’s local counsel that I understood that they were already aware that this ruling was coming down, and so they shifted their filings into other federal courts in other parts of the country to counterbalance what could be a shift in the law of the New York federal courts. Call this the dirty word “forum selection,” or call it whatever you would like, but there is a pattern which can be graphed like birds flocking across the U.S. based on rulings that happen in the federal courts.
In sum, in my jaded view over the past five years of dealing with nothing but these bittorrent cases, there is no way to shut down the Malibu Media, LLC copyright infringement / “extortion” machine, as this requires participation from every judge in every federal district court. And, it is a difficult task to break the “my court, my world, my rules” mentality that so many appointed federal judges have (where their appointments often have political leanings or where there is a loyalty to a certain belief system or group).
Specifically, even with an appointed federal judge with a political proclivity to a certain viewpoint, it becomes even more difficult to break the lobbyists’ (such as the MPAA / RIAA copyright anti-piracy lobby) grip, which whisper in the judges’ ears (rich with funding and which no doubt influence decisions across the U.S. [and I dare not bring the question of whether the judges are influenced by bias or “gifts” from these lobbyists (legal or otherwise), and I say this because there have been more than a few questionable rulings which suggest to me that at the very least, certain federal judges have a leaning towards one side or the other and where the law is clear, they still differ to allow the copyright holder to prevail]).
In sum, we have a legal system where when a judge upholds the law, he is lauded and congratulated as if he did something wonderful, when upholding the law was the job in which he was appointed to do and which he took an oath to uphold.
There are easy solutions to wipe out Malibu Media, LLC, and every other copyright troll out there who abuses the legal system in order to extort massive settlements from their defendants, however, the country appears not to be ready to address the issue. Senators, congressmen, federal judges, I don’t have anything to say except to do the right thing. And in the merit of judges such as District Judge Hellerstein, Judge Wright, and many other lone wolf judges who do uphold the law, you have my respect and my continued devotion.
Below are the most recent 100 Malibu Media, LLC filings, filed literally only in the past few weeks. You’ll notice, not one of them was filed in the Southern District of New York (or ANY New York federal court. I wonder why.)
OHIO NORTHERN DISTRICT COURT (Yousef M. Faroniya of Law Office of Yousef M. Faroniya) Malibu Media, LLC v. John Doe (Case No. 3:15-cv-01340) Malibu Media, LLC v. John Doe (Case No. 5:15-cv-01341) Malibu Media, LLC v. John Doe (Case No. 5:15-cv-01343) Malibu Media, LLC v. John Doe (Case No. 1:15-cv-01342) Malibu Media, LLC v. John Doe (Case No. 3:15-cv-01345) Malibu Media, LLC v. John Doe (Case No. 3:15-cv-01346) Malibu Media, LLC v. John Doe (Case No. 1:15-cv-01339) Malibu Media, LLC v. John Doe (Case No. 1:15-cv-01344) Malibu Media, LLC v. John Doe (Case No. 1:15-cv-01316) Malibu Media, LLC v. John Doe (Case No. 4:15-cv-01312) Malibu Media, LLC v. John Doe (Case No. 5:15-cv-01319) Malibu Media, LLC v. John Doe (Case No. 3:15-cv-01317) Malibu Media, LLC v. John Doe (Case No. 5:15-cv-01315) Malibu Media, LLC v. John Doe (Case No. 1:15-cv-01314)
OHIO SOUTHERN DISTRICT COURT (Yousef M. Faroniya of Law Office of Yousef M. Faroniya) Malibu Media, LLC v. John Doe (Case No. 3:15-cv-00235) Malibu Media, LLC v. John Doe (Case No. 2:15-cv-02516) Malibu Media, LLC v. John Doe (Case No. 2:15-cv-02518) Malibu Media, LLC v. John Doe (Case No. 2:15-cv-02515) Malibu Media, LLC v. John Doe (Case No. 2:15-cv-02477) Malibu Media, LLC v. John Doe (Case No. 3:15-cv-00236) Malibu Media, LLC v. John Doe (Case No. 2:15-cv-02517) Malibu Media, LLC v. John Doe (Case No. 2:15-cv-02519) Malibu Media, LLC v. John Doe (Case No. 1:15-cv-00435) Malibu Media, LLC v. John Doe (Case No. 2:15-cv-02456) Malibu Media, LLC v. John Doe (Case No. 3:15-cv-00230) Malibu Media, LLC v. John Doe (Case No. 1:15-cv-00423) Malibu Media, LLC v. John Doe (Case No. 2:15-cv-02453) Malibu Media, LLC v. John Doe (Case No. 2:15-cv-02454) Malibu Media, LLC v. John Doe (Case No. 1:15-cv-00422) Malibu Media, LLC v. John Doe (Case No. 2:15-cv-02455) Malibu Media, LLC v. John Doe (Case No. 2:15-cv-02457) Malibu Media, LLC v. John Doe (Case No. 3:15-cv-00224) Malibu Media, LLC v. John Doe (Case No. 3:15-cv-00224) Malibu Media, LLC v. John Doe (Case No. 3:15-cv-00228) Malibu Media, LLC v. John Doe (Case No. 2:15-cv-02452) Malibu Media, LLC v. John Doe (Case No. 1:15-cv-00420) Malibu Media, LLC v. John Doe (Case No. 1:15-cv-00421)
VIRGINIA EASTERN DISTRICT COURT (William E. Tabot of William E. Tabot PC) Malibu Media, LLC v. John Doe (Case No. 1:15-cv-00855) Malibu Media, LLC v. John Doe (Case No. 1:15-cv-00851) Malibu Media, LLC v. John Doe (Case No. 1:15-cv-00859) Malibu Media, LLC v. John Doe (Case No. 1:15-cv-00860) Malibu Media, LLC v. John Doe (Case No. 1:15-cv-00852) Malibu Media, LLC v. John Doe (Case No. 1:15-cv-00862) Malibu Media, LLC v. John Doe (Case No. 1:15-cv-00865) Malibu Media, LLC v. John Doe (Case No. 1:15-cv-00856) Malibu Media, LLC v. John Doe (Case No. 1:15-cv-00853) Malibu Media, LLC v. John Doe (Case No. 1:15-cv-00861) Malibu Media, LLC v. John Doe (Case No. 1:15-cv-00857) Malibu Media, LLC v. John Doe (Case No. 1:15-cv-00863) Malibu Media, LLC v. John Doe (Case No. 1:15-cv-00866) Malibu Media, LLC v. John Doe (Case No. 1:15-cv-00850)
PENNSYLVANIA EASTERN DISTRICT COURT (Christopher P. Fiore of Fiore & Barber LLC) Malibu Media, LLC v. John Doe (Case No. 2:15-cv-03598) Malibu Media, LLC v. John Doe (Case No. 2:15-cv-03600) Malibu Media, LLC v. John Doe (Case No. 2:15-cv-03602) Malibu Media, LLC v. John Doe (Case No. 2:15-cv-03604) Malibu Media, LLC v. John Doe (Case No. 5:15-cv-03599) Malibu Media, LLC v. John Doe (Case No. 2:15-cv-03601) Malibu Media, LLC v. John Doe (Case No. 2:15-cv-03603) Malibu Media, LLC v. John Doe (Case No. 2:15-cv-03605)
MARYLAND DISTRICT COURT (Jon A. Hoppe of Maddox Hoppe Hoofnagle & Hafey LLC) Malibu Media, LLC v. John Doe (Case No. 1:15-cv-01851) Malibu Media, LLC v. John Doe (Case No. 1:15-cv-01864) Malibu Media, LLC v. John Doe (Case No. 1:15-cv-01865) Malibu Media, LLC v. John Doe (Case No. 1:15-cv-01855) Malibu Media, LLC v. John Doe (Case No. 1:15-cv-01861) Malibu Media, LLC v. John Doe (Case No. 1:15-cv-01862) Malibu Media, LLC v. John Doe (Case No. 1:15-cv-01869) Malibu Media, LLC v. John Doe (Case No. 1:15-cv-01854) Malibu Media, LLC v. John Doe (Case No. 1:15-cv-01866) Malibu Media, LLC v. John Doe (Case No. 1:15-cv-01868) Malibu Media, LLC v. John Doe (Case No. 1:15-cv-01859) Malibu Media, LLC v. John Doe (Case No. 8:15-cv-01858) Malibu Media, LLC v. John Doe (Case No. 1:15-cv-01871) Malibu Media, LLC v. John Doe (Case No. 8:15-cv-01863) Malibu Media, LLC v. John Doe (Case No. 1:15-cv-01853) Malibu Media, LLC v. John Doe (Case No. 1:15-cv-01867) Malibu Media, LLC v. John Doe (Case No. 1:15-cv-01870) Malibu Media, LLC v. John Doe (Case No. 1:15-cv-01857) Malibu Media, LLC v. John Doe (Case No. 8:15-cv-01856)
NEW JERSEY DISTRICT COURT (Patrick J. Cerillo – Attorney at Law) Malibu Media, LLC v. John Doe (Case No. 2:15-cv-04307) Malibu Media, LLC v. John Doe (Case No. 2:15-cv-04309) Malibu Media, LLC v. John Doe (Case No. 2:15-cv-04276) Malibu Media, LLC v. John Doe (Case No. 2:15-cv-04305) Malibu Media, LLC v. John Doe (Case No. 3:15-cv-04287) Malibu Media, LLC v. John Doe (Case No. 3:15-cv-04288) Malibu Media, LLC v. John Doe (Case No. 2:15-cv-04308) Malibu Media, LLC v. John Doe (Case No. 2:15-cv-04304) Malibu Media, LLC v. John Doe (Case No. 2:15-cv-04275) Malibu Media, LLC v. John Doe (Case No. 2:15-cv-04278) Malibu Media, LLC v. John Doe (Case No. 2:15-cv-04310) Malibu Media, LLC v. John Doe (Case No. 2:15-cv-04272) Malibu Media, LLC v. John Doe (Case No. 2:15-cv-04273) Malibu Media, LLC v. John Doe (Case No. 3:15-cv-04269) Malibu Media, LLC v. John Doe (Case No. 2:15-cv-04230) Malibu Media, LLC v. John Doe (Case No. 2:15-cv-04232) Malibu Media, LLC v. John Doe (Case No. 3:15-cv-04243)
MICHIGAN EASTERN DISTRICT COURT (Paul J. Nicoletti of Nicoletti Law PLC) Malibu Media, LLC v. John Doe (Case No. 2:15-cv-12293) Malibu Media, LLC v. John Doe (Case No. 2:15-cv-12294) Malibu Media, LLC v. John Doe (Case No. 2:15-cv-12274) Malibu Media, LLC v. John Doe (Case No. 2:15-cv-12283) Malibu Media, LLC v. John Doe (Case No. 2:15-cv-12290)
— CONTACT FORM: If you have a question or comment about what I have written, and you want to keep it *for my eyes only*, please feel free to use the form below. The information you post will be e-mailed to me, and I will be happy to respond.
NOTE: No attorney client relationship is established by sending this form, and while the attorney-client privilege (which keeps everything that you share confidential and private) attaches immediately when you contact me, I do not become your attorney until we sign a contract together. That being said, please do not state anything “incriminating” about your case when using this form, or more practically, in any e-mail.
An article about Manny Film LLC lawsuits shifts towards Defense Attorney Tamaroff who once represented defendants but became a copyright troll.
PERSONAL NOTE: I started writing this article about the Manny Pacquiao film lawsuits, and the more I read about the cases, the more upset I got. The gist of the article was originally going to be that the same plaintiff “copyright troll” attorneys who have been filing cases against John Doe Defendants for their Malibu Media LLC client are the same attorneys for the many Manny Film LLC cases filed across the U.S. Thus, we will be able to predict when representing clients what they will be doing with these lawsuits.
However, there is a real story here with the Manny Film LLC lawsuits, and that story is how the copyright trolls have succeeded in luring those who I considered my peers (fellow defense attorneys) to switch sides to the plaintiff “copyright troll” side of these abusive lawsuits and start suing the very same group of people they once built their reputation swearing to protect. That’s the real story.
Imagine you are downloading the “Top Ten Pirated Movies” from TorrentFreak… Exodus: Gods and Kings… The Hobbit… Fifty Shades of Grey… the newest Hunger Games… and you say, “oh yeah, let me pull that crappy looking movie that is also here, Manny (2014). Maybe it will be the new Rocky.”
How upset would you be after you wasted 88 minutes of your life that you will never get back, and you realize that critics HATED the film? How much more upset would you be when you receive a subpoena notice in the mail from your ISP that you have been sued in federal court for the piracy of …not Fifty Shades of Grey… not the Hobbit or Hunger Games… but for that Manny Pacquiao film?!? How much more upset would you be when you find out that the copyright holder / corporate entity for that Manny Pacquiao film, “Manny Film LLC,” has hired Lipscomb & Eisenberg, the law firm behind ALL of the copyright troll attorneys who have been filing the Malibu Media, LLC lawsuits all across the U.S.?
Then, how would you feel if you found out that the local attorneys hired by Lipscomb generally don’t play fair when discovery is requested, or when a valid defense is asserted? And when you learn that all of the Malibu Media dirty little secrets that their digital forensics are flawed (just as Manny Film LLC’s forensics are probably equally as flawed), how would you feel then when they block your attempts at discovering the truth of their operation? Then, when you decided to make a reasonable offer to settle the claims against you, how would you feel when the plaintiff attorneys reject your reasonable offer, and instead they offer you an INCOME-BASED SETTLEMENT — a settlement NOT based on the fair market value of the movie you downloaded, but rather a settlement based on your neighborhood’s median income based on public information and property values in your zip code?
Yep, I could imagine you’d be a bit upset.
Let’s make this a bit more personal. As of writing this article, it appears as if over 150 cases have been filed so far in four (4) states — New Jersey, Ohio, and notably, Florida and Pennsylvania. The plaintiff attorneys in the Manny Film LLC cases are the same attorneys that you will find for the Malibu Media lawsuits, and thus we already have an idea of what to expect from each character:
Keith Lipscomb himself is the attorney handling the Florida lawsuits (although I suspect he’s the kingpin behind all of the lawsuits filed in every state).
What bothers me about Jordan Rushie playing plaintiff is that I suspect that he is an apprentice of Marc Randazza (I expect Marc has mentored him quite well since they started working together in 2012). Thus, anyone who knew the then-innocent Jordan Rushie from before the partnership (you know, the guy who posted on twitter comments and even made a YouTube video about his leather briefcase, and asking the Twitter world which bag looked most professional so that he can look good when he shows up in court) will likely see a very different and more seasoned Jordan Rushie with these lawsuits.
Since I mentioned Marc’s name, Marc Randazza was the plaintiff attorney for the Liberty Media Holdings, LLC (most notably, Liberty Media Holdings, LLC v. John Does 1-441 where he broke the mold of how far a copyright troll is willing to push a lawsuit, where while most copyright trolls only huff and bluff about naming and serving defendants, Marc didn’t even threaten to do so — he just did it. His settlements were also significantly higher than the average and included questionable stipulated settlements. Jordan Rushie in 2012 became his local counsel, and no doubt, the schooling Marc hopefully has given him will make Jordan a formidable attorney to anyone who downloaded that Manny movie.
Lastly, I don’t know if I read this correctly, but I think (UPDATE: I did, and I am very upset about this) I also saw that David Tamaroff and Daniel Tamaroff of their Tamaroff & Tamaroff Law Firm were the plaintiff attorneys for all of the Florida Middle District cases. This is not only upsetting — this is a betrayal, as David and his brother Daniel have spent so much money, time, and effort trying to build their practice on the DEFENSE side of things. Why they would ruin their reputation and start representing the copyright troll side of the lawsuits is beyond me. Don’t they realize that copyright trolling is a slippery slope, and eventually it leads to the copyright troll losing his law license?!? All I could say to them is, “Tread carefully. Trolling is a slippery slope, especially with the company of folks you’ve aligned yourselves with.”
There you go. The Manny film. Quite honestly, who cares even a little bit about the film. The people behind the Manny film obviously have crooked morals, as they have chosen Lipscomb and the Malibu Media gang to use their copyrighted film to extort money from what will be countless internet users. I wonder how many of those who will be the accused downloaders even watched the film that they downloaded, and if so, I wonder whether they recall the experience, and would they do it again if they knew what was going to happen to them next. AT LEAST when speaking to Malibu Media defendants, I sometimes get a guilty chuckle from the accused downloaders saying, “yeah, those were good videos.”
[HINDSIGHT: (2017 UPDATE, AND INTERESTING FACT:) IN 2015, YOU CAN SEE THAT I SUSPECTED THAT THERE WAS A REASON WHY THE ATTORNEYS FILING THE MANNY FILM LAWSUITS WERE THE SAME ATTORNEYS FILING THE MALIBU MEDIA PORN-BASED LAWSUITS, BUT BACK THEN, I COULDN’T PUT MY FINGER ON IT.
CONTACT FORM: Alternatively, sometimes people just like to contact me using one of these forms. If you have a question or comment about what I have written, and you want to keep it *for my eyes only*, please feel free to use the form below. The information you post will be e-mailed to me, and I will be happy to respond.
NOTE: No attorney client relationship is established by sending this form, and while the attorney-client privilege (which keeps everything that you share confidential and private) attaches immediately when you contact me, I do not become your attorney until we sign a contract together. That being said, please do not state anything “incriminating” about your case when using this form, or more practically, in any e-mail.
Filed in the U.S. District Court of New Jersey (NJD) Plaintiff Jordan Rushie sometimes misspelled on the court record as, “Jordan Rusie of Flynn Wirkus Young PC”
Manny Film LLC v. Doe (Case No. 1:15-cv-01497) Manny Film LLC v. Doe (Case No. 1:15-cv-01498) Manny Film LLC v. Doe (Case No. 1:15-cv-01529) Manny Film LLC v. Doe (Case No. 1:15-cv-01530) Manny Film LLC v. Doe (Case No. 1:15-cv-01531) Manny Film LLC v. Doe (Case No. 1:15-cv-01533) Manny Film LLC v. Doe (Case No. 1:15-cv-01534) Manny Film LLC v. Doe (Case No. 1:15-cv-01539) Manny Film LLC v. Doe (Case No. 1:15-cv-01564) Manny Film LLC v. Doe (Case No. 1:15-cv-01565) Manny Film LLC v. Doe (Case No. 2:15-cv-01482) Manny Film LLC v. Doe (Case No. 2:15-cv-01483) Manny Film LLC v. Doe (Case No. 2:15-cv-01484) Manny Film LLC v. Doe (Case No. 2:15-cv-01487) Manny Film LLC v. Doe (Case No. 2:15-cv-01488) Manny Film LLC v. Doe (Case No. 2:15-cv-01495) Manny Film LLC v. Doe (Case No. 2:15-cv-01503) Manny Film LLC v. Doe (Case No. 2:15-cv-01504) Manny Film LLC v. Doe (Case No. 2:15-cv-01517) Manny Film LLC v. Doe (Case No. 2:15-cv-01518) Manny Film LLC v. Doe (Case No. 2:15-cv-01520) Manny Film LLC v. Doe (Case No. 2:15-cv-01521) Manny Film LLC v. Doe (Case No. 2:15-cv-01522) Manny Film LLC v. Doe (Case No. 2:15-cv-01523) Manny Film LLC v. Doe (Case No. 2:15-cv-01528) Manny Film LLC v. Doe (Case No. 2:15-cv-01532) Manny Film LLC v. Doe (Case No. 2:15-cv-01535) Manny Film LLC v. Doe (Case No. 2:15-cv-01536) Manny Film LLC v. Doe (Case No. 2:15-cv-01537) Manny Film LLC v. Doe (Case No. 2:15-cv-01538) Manny Film LLC v. Doe (Case No. 2:15-cv-01540) Manny Film LLC v. Doe (Case No. 2:15-cv-01541) Manny Film LLC v. Doe (Case No. 2:15-cv-01542) Manny Film LLC v. Doe (Case No. 3:15-cv-01489) Manny Film LLC v. Doe (Case No. 3:15-cv-01490) Manny Film LLC v. Doe (Case No. 3:15-cv-01545) Manny Film LLC v. Doe (Case No. 3:15-cv-01552) Manny Film LLC v. Doe (Case No. 3:15-cv-01553) Manny Film LLC v. Doe (Case No. 3:15-cv-01554) Manny Film LLC v. Doe (Case No. 3:15-cv-01557)
Filed in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania (PAED) Plaintiff Attorney: Christopher P. Fiore of Fiore & Barber LLC
Manny Film LLC v. John Doe (Case No. 2:15-cv-01157) Manny Film LLC v. John Doe (Case No. 2:15-cv-01156) Manny Film LLC v. John Doe (Case No. 2:15-cv-01158) Manny Film LLC v. John Doe (Case No. 2:15-cv-01159) Manny Film LLC v. John Doe (Case No. 2:15-cv-01163) Manny Film LLC v. John Doe (Case No. 2:15-cv-01164) Manny Film LLC v. John Doe (Case No. 2:15-cv-01165) Manny Film LLC v. John Doe (Case No. 2:15-cv-01166) Manny Film LLC v. John Doe (Case No. 2:15-cv-01167) Manny Film LLC v. John Doe (Case No. 2:15-cv-01168) Manny Film LLC v. John Doe (Case No. 2:15-cv-01170) Manny Film LLC v. John Doe (Case No. 2:15-cv-01171) Manny Film LLC v. John Doe (Case No. 2:15-cv-01172) Manny Film LLC v. John Doe (Case No. 2:15-cv-01173) Manny Film LLC v. John Doe (Case No. 2:15-cv-01174) Manny Film LLC v. John Doe (Case No. 2:15-cv-01175) Manny Film LLC v. John Doe (Case No. 2:15-cv-01176) Manny Film LLC v. John Doe (Case No. 2:15-cv-01178) Manny Film LLC v. John Doe (Case No. 2:15-cv-01179) Manny Film LLC v. John Doe (Case No. 2:15-cv-01180)
Filed in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Ohio (OHND) Plaintiff Attorney: Yousef Faroniya
Manny Film, LLC v. Doe (Case No. 1:15-cv-00465) Manny Film, LLC v. Doe (Case No. 1:15-cv-00466) Manny Film, LLC v. Doe (Case No. 1:15-cv-00467) Manny Film, LLC v. Doe (Case No. 3:15-cv-00463) Manny Film, LLC v. Doe (Case No. 3:15-cv-00464) Manny Film, LLC v. Doe (Case No. 3:15-cv-00461) Manny Film, LLC v. Doe (Case No. 3:15-cv-00462) Manny Film, LLC v. Doe (Case No. 1:15-cv-00451) Manny Film, LLC v. Doe (Case No. 1:15-cv-00460) Manny Film, LLC v. Doe (Case No. 1:15-cv-00444)
Filed in the U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Florida (FLMD) Plaintiff Attorney: Daniel F. Tamaroff & David F. Tamaroff of Tamaroff & Tamaroff
Manny Film LLC v. John Doe (Case No. 3:15-cv-00262) Manny Film LLC v. John Doe (Case No.3:15-cv-00263 ) Manny Film LLC v. John Doe (Case No. 3:15-cv-00265) Manny Film LLC v. John Doe (Case No. 3:15-cv-00266) Manny Film LLC v. John Doe (Case No. 6:15-cv-00366) Manny Film LLC v. John Doe (Case No. 6:15-cv-00368) Manny Film LLC v. John Doe (Case No. 6:15-cv-00370) Manny Film LLC v. John Doe (Case No. 6:15-cv-00371) Manny Film LLC v. John Doe (Case No. 6:15-cv-00373) Manny Film LLC v. John Doe (Case No. 6:15-cv-00374) Manny Film LLC v. John Doe (Case No. 6:15-cv-00377) Manny Film LLC v. John Doe (Case No. 6:15-cv-00378) Manny Film LLC v. John Doe (Case No. 6:15-cv-00380) Manny Film LLC v. John Doe (Case No. 6:15-cv-00381) Manny Film LLC v. John Doe (Case No. 6:15-cv-00382) Manny Film LLC v. John Doe (Case No. 3:15-cv-00264) Manny Film LLC v. John Doe (Case No. 6:15-cv-00365) Manny Film LLC v. John Doe (Case No. 6:15-cv-00367) Manny Film LLC v. John Doe (Case No. 6:15-cv-00369) Manny Film LLC v. John Doe (Case No. 6:15-cv-00372) Manny Film LLC v. John Doe (Case No. 6:15-cv-00375) Manny Film LLC v. John Doe (Case No. 6:15-cv-00379) Manny Film LLC v. John Doe (Case No. 8:15-cv-00506) Manny Film LLC v. John Doe (Case No. 8:15-cv-00507) Manny Film LLC v. John Doe (Case No. 8:15-cv-00508) Manny Film LLC v. John Doe (Case No. 8:15-cv-00509) Manny Film LLC v. John Doe (Case No. 8:15-cv-00510) Manny Film LLC v. John Doe (Case No. 8:15-cv-00495) Manny Film LLC v. John Doe (Case No. 8:15-cv-00496) Manny Film LLC v. John Doe (Case No. 8:15-cv-00497) Manny Film LLC v. John Doe (Case No. 8:15-cv-00498) Manny Film LLC v. John Doe (Case No. 8:15-cv-00499) Manny Film LLC v. John Doe (Case No. 8:15-cv-00500) Manny Film LLC v. John Doe (Case No. 8:15-cv-00501) Manny Film LLC v. John Doe (Case No. 8:15-cv-00502) Manny Film LLC v. John Doe (Case No. 2:15-cv-00145) Manny Film LLC v. John Doe (Case No. 8:15-cv-00503) Manny Film LLC v. John Doe (Case No. 8:15-cv-00504) Manny Film LLC v. John Doe (Case No. 8:15-cv-00505)
Filed in the U.S. District Courtfor the Southern District of Florida (FLSD) Plaintiff Attorney: M. Keith Lipscomb of Lipscomb Eisenberg & Baker PLLC
Manny Film LLC v. John Doe (Case No. 0:15-cv-60454) Manny Film LLC v. John Doe, subscriber assigned IP address 98.242.175.83 (Case No. 0:15-cv-60455) Manny Film LLC v. John Doe, subscriber assigned IP address 98.249.236.20 (Case No. 0:15-cv-60456) Manny Film LLC v. John Doe, subscriber assigned IP address 98.242.147.5 (Case No. 1:15-cv-20923) Manny Film LLC v. John Doe, subscriber assigned IP address 76.26.2.226 (Case No. 9:15-cv-80306) Manny Film LLC v. John Doe (Case No. 9:15-cv-80307) Manny Film LLC v. John Doe (Case No. 1:15-cv-20924) Manny Film LLC v. John Doe (Case No. 9:15-cv-80301) Manny Film LLC v. John Doe (Case No. 9:15-cv-80302) Manny Film LLC v. John Doe, subscriber assigned IP address 76.110.177.255 (Case No. 9:15-cv-80303) Manny Film LLC v. John Doe, subscriber assigned IP address 75.74.122.227 (Case No. 1:15-cv-20920) Manny Film LLC v. John Doe, subscriber assigned IP address 76.110.203.201 (Case No. 1:15-cv-20921) Manny Film LLC v. John Doe, subscriber assigned IP address 66.176.226.21 (Case No. 0:15-cv-60444) Manny Film LLC v. John Doe, subscriber assigned IP address 66.176.99.53 (Case No. 0:15-cv-60445) Manny Film LLC v. John Doe, subscriber assigned IP address 66.229.140.101 (Case No. 0:15-cv-60446) Manny Film LLC v. John Doe (Case No. 0:15-cv-60447) Manny Film LLC v. John Doe (Case No. 1:15-cv-20905) Manny Film LLC v. John Doe (Case No. 9:15-cv-80298) Manny Film LLC v. John Doe (Case No. 0:15-cv-60448) Manny Film LLC v. John Doe (Case No. 1:15-cv-20907) Manny Film LLC v. John Doe (Case No. 9:15-cv-80297) Manny Film LLC v. John Doe (Case No. 0:15-cv-60453) Manny Film LLC v. John Doe (Case No. 0:15-cv-60438) Manny Film LLC v. John Doe (Case No. 0:15-cv-60440) Manny Film LLC v. John Doe (Case No. 0:15-cv-60441) Manny Film LLC v. John Doe (Case No. 0:15-cv-60442) Manny Film LLC v. John Doe, subscriber assigned IP address 174.61.56.69 (Case No. 1:15-cv-20894) Manny Film LLC v. John Doe, subscriber assigned IP address 174.61.157.43 (Case No. 1:15-cv-20895) Manny Film LLC v. John Doe (Case No. 1:15-cv-20896) Manny Film LLC v. John Doe (Case No. 1:15-cv-20899)
