Lowenberg Law Firm | TorrentLawyer.com

I have added this page for internet users who have been entangled in the Malibu Media, LLC (“X-Art”) cases. Malibu Media, LLC is an adult film / pornographic film producer, and they sue individual John Doe Defendants for the IP address-tracked download of literally “everything on their website” based on their demographics in federal courts across the US.

The goal of this page is to keep up to date on this plaintiff, and to discuss their various cases. Should you learn of any updates regarding one of their cases, please post it here using the following format — (e.g., “Malibu Media, LLC v. John Doe subscriber having IP address 182.765.456.844 (Case No. 7:12-cv-03812) filed in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York”). Please also feel free to post new cases you find where Malibu Media, LLC is listed as the plaintiff.

WHAT YOU NEED TO KNOW ABOUT MALIBU MEDIA LAWSUITS (FAQ):

Below is a good starting point to understand who Malibu Media, LLC is, and why you are being sued. For a more in-depth article on the Malibu Media, LLC copyright trolling scheme, visit the “EVERYTHING YOU NEED TO KNOW IN ONE PAGE ABOUT YOUR MALIBU MEDIA, LLC (‘X-ART’ SITERIP) MOVIE LAWSUIT AND ISP SUBPOENA” article on my Cashman Law Firm, PLLC site.

WHAT IS MALIBU MEDIA, LLC?

Malibu Media, LLC is the company filing the copyright infringement lawsuits for the “x-art.com” adult film website. Since 2012, Malibu Media, LLC has flooded the federal courts over 6000+ copyright infringement lawsuits based on IP address-tracked downloads of their adult film movies. Each lawsuit sues for the illegal download of one film, but alleges that the defendant downloaded 20-80 additional titles. They seek $150,000 in statutory damages for the download of that one film.

Malibu Media, LLC is notorious for accusing downloaders of downloading “siterips,” where an internet user clicks on one (1) trackable file, but within that trackable file are 20-80 additional videos. People claim that Malibu Media, LLC is ‘leaking’ and uploading these siterips themselves, and then tracking the online swarms to see who downloads them.

Have you read enough? Book Now to get help. > > >

What is Malibu Media’s affiliation with Guardaley?

Malibu Media, LLC has been intimately associated with a German company called Guardaley to track their online swarms and provide so-called forensic “evidence” in the many lawsuits. Guardaley is a questionable company and their tracking methods have been discredited by the German courts. Guardaley is known to claim that an accused defendant downloaded an entire file (or a set of videos) as soon as he or she clicks on the trackable file and loads up the sharing via IP address software (before even a byte of data is even downloaded). Many accused defendants that I have spoken to claim that they never finished any of Malibu Media, LLC’s downloads (yet they were sued anyway).

How does Malibu Media, LLC choose which downloader to sue?

Once a Malibu Media, LLC identifies a downloader, they continue to track that downloader over the course of months. Lawsuits are filed against downloaders based on the geolocation of where the accused downloader apparently lives.

MALIBU MEDIA USES INCOME DEMOGRAPHICS BASED ON ZIP CODE TO DETERMINE WHO TO SUE.

Malibu Media has been known to check the location of the IP address against a list of zip codes, and compare those zip codes to demographic income information and home property values within those zip codes. Poorer communities generally are discarded, and wealthier communities end up prioritised and sued. The reason for this is that wealthier professionals have larger bank accounts, more assets, larger families, and are likely professionals and specialists within their trade, meaning that they are more apt to settle a lawsuit filed against them for the download and viewing of pornographic materials.

How much does Malibu Media, LLC ask for in a settlement?

In a settlement negotiation, Malibu Media, LLC knows that copyright holders traditionally ask for $3,500 for the download of one title. They also know that settlements can be anywhere between $1,500-$1,800 once negotiated by an attorney. For this reason, they start their negotiations at $1,500 PER TITLE when they are called by an accused defendant.

Thus, an accused downloader who was claimed to download 20 titles should expect an initial settlement offer of $30,000 ($1,500 x 20 = $30K; an obscene number).

As soon as an attorney opens up settlement negotiations, Malibu Media, LLC is known to immediately drop the settlement asking price to $750 PER TITLE (they refer to this as ‘minimum statutory damages,’ which multiplied by the number of titles they ask for in a settlement results in an obscene settlement asking price). From there, we would normally determine 1) whether to settle or fight the case based on the merits of the lawsuit (many of my clients simply do not do the download), or 2) whether to negotiate down from there.

What about Malibu Media anonymous settlements?”

Malibu Media, LLC settlements, with some tweaking of the settlement agreement during the settlement negotiations can be an anonymous settlement. There are a small number of settlement factory attorneys who are advertising and advocating “anonymous settlements.” Buyer beware, as settling anonymously in the way they suggest can expose you to additional lawsuits, AFTER you have just paid Malibu a settlement.

Click here to read about “Malibu Media anonymous settlement, a misnomer,” written on 7/23/2017.

Have you read enough? Book Now to get help. > > >

How our Cashman Law Firm, PLLC uses LEVERAGE to minimize the settlement amount.

Because we are willing to fight each case on the merits (remember, Malibu Media lawsuits are based on Guardaley tracking methods, which are faulty), we do have leverage to negotiate the settlements down to something significantly more reasonable. Up front, I do not encourage settlements nor do I push them on clients (especially if they did not do the download), but settlement negotiations are a good tool to consider when deciding whether to proceed with defending the case in court, or whether offering a settlement can minimize the costs to accused defendants.

(If we are fighting, here is a settlement tactic: Remember, if a settlement is offered and we end up fighting the case, and the ultimate judgement amount ends up being LESS than the settlement amount we offered, Malibu Media, LLC’s attorneys will likely be liable to the accused defendant for ALL THE ATTORNEY FEES SPENT AFTER THE OFFER OF SETTLEMENT WAS MADE.)

HOW MALIBU MEDIA, LLC OPERATES THEIR LAWSUITS ACROSS THE U.S.

Malibu Media, LLC (and correspondingly, Guardaley) operates their lawsuits from one central location. They usually choose a figurehead, or a law firm to manage and coordinate all of the attorneys filing lawsuits on their behalf across the US.

Until 2016, Malibu Media, LLC lawsuits were run by Keith Lipscomb of Lipscomb & Eisenberg (now defunct, I believe). After Lipscomb, they were temporarily run locally from a law firm called Pillar Law Firm, and now I have reason to believe they are apparently being run by Carl Crowell and his RIGHTSENFORCEMENT entity.

WHY DID LIPSCOMB AND MALIBU MEDIA, LLC PART WAYS?

The reason Keith Lipscomb and Malibu Media, LLC parted ways was because Lipscomb apparently did not pay Malibu Media, LLC the millions of dollars they made in settlements.

I have analyzed the numbers and it is unclear whether the Malibu Media, LLC lawsuits were profitable for Lipscomb, or whether he is yet one more copyright troll attorney who has cheated his copyright troll client.

WHERE IS MALIBU MEDIA SUING DEFENDANTS? WHAT ATTORNEYS ARE THEY USING?

Malibu Media appears to be focusing their lawsuits in Texas, and the New York / New Jersey / Connecticut tri-state area.

Malibu’s attorney for the Texas cases is Andrew Kumar and Michael Lowenberg of the Lowenberg Law Firm.

Malibu’s attorney for the NY & CT cases is Jacqueline James.

Malibu’s attorney for the NJ cases is Patrick Cerillo.

You can read the details about these three Malibu Media, LLC attorneys, here.

There are other attorneys filing Malibu Media cases across the US, and I have listed the main attorneys below. Those that file sporadically have been dropped from the list.

List of Malibu Media, LLC single-defendant cases filed as of 3/17/2017:

Jacqueline James (28% of all Malibu Cases)
Connecticut (38 Cases)
New York (40 Cases)

Andrew Kumar / Michael Lowenberg (16% of all Malibu Cases)
Texas (42 Cases)

Patrick Cerillo (14% of all Malibu Cases)
New Jersey (38 Cases)

Joel Bernier (6% of all Malibu Cases)
Michigan (MIED) (16 Cases)

Mary Schulz (4% of all Malibu Cases)
Illinois (ILND) (12 Cases)

Jon Hoppe (3% of all Malibu Cases)
Maryland (7 Cases)

Jordan Rushie (3% of all Malibu Cases)
Pennsylvania (PAED) (8 Cases)

John Decker (1% of all Malibu Cases)
Virginia (VAED) (3 Cases)

Have you read enough? Book Now to get help. > > >

TorrentLawyer Malibu Media, LLC Articles:

Below are recent articles we at the Cashman Law Firm, PLLC have written on the Malibu Media, LLC plaintiff:

“Malibu Media anonymous settlement, a misnomer.,” written on 7/23/2017

“Judge forces Malibu Media to reveal the accuracy of their geolocation technology,” on 5/10/2017

“Malibu Media movies, and why it is important to know this list,” written on 5/5/2017.

“Malibu Media Cases and Why To Track Their Monthly Filings,” written on 5/4/2017.

“Turnkey ‘Settlement Factory’ Defense Attorneys and Malibu Media LLC,” written on 3/29/2017.

“Malibu Media, LLC appears to be adhering to an ‘Old Guard, New Guard’ distinction between their older and newer attorneys,” written on 3/13/2017.

“Confirmed: Malibu Media invests in $400 filing fees at $20,000/month,” written on 3/13/2017.

“2017 Malibu Media – Where Cases Are Filed and Who are the Attorneys?” written on 3/13/2017.

“Malibu Media, LLC cases facing hard scrutiny in California,” written on 12/23/2016.

“Malibu Media, LLC appears to be on a $20,000/month filing budget,” written on 12/23/2016.

“Was Lipscomb’s Malibu Media v. Doe campaign profitable?” written on 12/22/2016.

“What happened to Malibu Media, LLC in April 2016?” written on 12/21/2016.

“Is Malibu Media “faking” the publication requirement in their lawsuits?” written on 2/9/2016.

“Judge rules that (Guardaley) German investigator’s evidence is insufficient to prove direct infringement” written on 7/28/2015.

“My Response to the yet-to-be-written guilty verdict in the Malibu Media, LLC Bellwether Trial (PAED)” written on 6/12/2013.

“Malibu Media targets rich neighborhoods, and introduces prejudicial character evidence into each case” written on 6/4/2013.

“UNDER THE RADAR, 122 MALIBU MEDIA LLC ‘SINGLE-DOE’ CASES FILED,” written on 3/7/2013.

“California Judge Consolidates ALL Malibu Media, LLC Cases, and WHY THIS IS BAD,” written on 7/12/2012.

“(UPDATED) Forum Shopping by Malibu Media, LLC Copyright Trolls” written on 5/7/2012.

“Malibu Media, LLC cases go down in FLAMES in Virginia,” written on 4/3/2012.

“Malibu Media, LLC – Friend or Foe? Foe!” written on 3/23/2012

FOR IMMEDIATE CONTACT WITH AN ATTORNEY: Click here for more general information about Malibu Media, LLC lawsuits, their tactics, and their strategies.

To set up a free consultation to speak to an attorney about your Malibu Media, LLC lawsuit, click here.

Lastly, please feel free to e-mail me at [email protected], or call 713-364-3476 to speak to me now about your case (I do prefer you read the articles first), or to get your questions answered.

CONTACT FORM: Alternatively, sometimes people just like to contact me using one of these forms. If you have a question or comment about what I have written, and you want to keep it *for my eyes only*, please feel free to use the form below. The information you post will be e-mailed to me, and I will be happy to respond.

NOTE: No attorney client relationship is established by sending this form, and while the attorney-client privilege (which keeps everything that you share confidential and private) attaches immediately when you contact me, I do not become your attorney until we sign a contract together. That being said, please do not state anything “incriminating” about your case when using this form, or more practically, in any e-mail.

Have you read enough? Book Now to get help. > > >

LIST OF MALIBU CASES FILED TO DATE (2017 CASES ONLY, AS OF 3/12/2017)

Cases in the Connecticut District Court (38)
Attorney: Jacqueline M. James (“Jackie James”) of The James Law Firm, PPLC

Malibu Media, LLC v. Doe (Case Nos. 3:17-cv-00187, 3:17-cv-00188, 3:17-cv-00189, 3:17-cv-00190, 3:17-cv-00195, 3:17-cv-00203, 3:17-cv-00213, 3:17-cv-00219, 3:17-cv-00220, 3:17-cv-00221, 3:17-cv-00223, 3:17-cv-00224, 3:17-cv-00225, 3:17-cv-00227, 3:17-cv-00229, 3:17-cv-00230, 3:17-cv-00232, 3:17-cv-00233, 3:17-cv-00249, 3:17-cv-00250, 3:17-cv-00251, 3:17-cv-00252, 3:17-cv-00253, 3:17-cv-00254, 3:17-cv-00256, 3:17-cv-00257, 3:17-cv-00258, 3:17-cv-00259, 3:17-cv-00271, 3:17-cv-00272, 3:17-cv-00273, 3:17-cv-00274, 3:17-cv-00275, 3:17-cv-00276, 3:17-cv-00277, 3:17-cv-00278, 3:17-cv-00279, 3:17-cv-00280)

Cases Filed in the Illinois Northern District Court (12)
Attorney: Mary K. Schulz of the Media Litigation Firm, P.C.

Malibu Media, LLC v. Doe, subscriber assigned IP address 208.59.138.51 (Case No. 1:17-cv-01183)
…v. Doe, subscriber assigned IP address 24.14.89.147 (Case No. 1:17-cv-01190)
…v. Doe, subscriber assigned IP address 50.172.197.139 (Case No. 1:17-cv-01195)
…v. Doe, subscriber assigned IP address 67.175.128.50 (Case No. 1:17-cv-01196)
…v. Doe, subscriber assigned IP address 73.168.198.228 (Case No. 1:17-cv-01197)
…v. Doe, subscriber assigned IP address 73.74.242.152 (Case No. 1:17-cv-01200)
…v. Doe, subscriber assigned IP address 75.27.62.75 (Case No. 1:17-cv-01201)
…v. Doe, subscriber assigned IP address 75.28.181.87 (Case No. 1:17-cv-01202)
…v. Doe, subscriber assigned IP address 76.231.75.139 (Case No. 1:17-cv-01206)
…v. Doe, subscriber assigned IP address 98.206.219.205 (Case No. 1:17-cv-01210)
…v. Doe, subscriber assigned IP address 98.227.75.40 (Case No. 1:17-cv-01396)
…v. Doe, subscriber assigned IP address96.95.112.34 (Case No. 1:17-cv-01209)

Cases Filed in the Maryland District Court (7)
Attorney: Jon Alexander Hoppe (“Jon Hoppe”) of the Law Office of Jon a Hoppe, Esquire

Malibu Media, LLC v. Doe (Case Nos. 8:17-cv-00397, 8:17-cv-00396, 1:17-cv-00402, 8:17-cv-00401, 1:17-cv-00398, 1:17-cv-00399, 8:17-cv-00400)

Cases Filed in the Michigan Eastern District Court (16)
Attorney: Joel A. Bernier of Sheikh Legal Services PLLC
176 S. Main St., Suite 1, Mount Clemens, MI 48043 ([email protected])

MALIBU MEDIA, LCC v. John Doe (Case No. 2:17-cv-10422)
v. IP Address 107.4.109.143 (Case No. 2:17-cv-10426)
v. IP Address 107.4.109.143 (Case No. 5:17-cv-10426)
v. IP Address 68.32.2.28 (Case No. 2:17-cv-10432)
v. IP Address 68.49.201.228 (Case No. 2:17-cv-10442)
v. IP Address 68.49.243.199 (Case No. 2:17-cv-10443)
v. IP Address 68.49.243.199 (Case No. 2:17-cv-10445)
v. IP Address 68.55.89.28 (Case No. 2:17-cv-10444)
v. IP Address 68.55.89.28 (Case No. 4:17-cv-10444)
v. IP Address 68.56.223.52 (Case No. 2:17-cv-10446)
v. IP Address 68.56.223.52 (Case No. 2:17-cv-10447)
v. IP Address 68.60.174.21 (Case No. 2:17-cv-10448)
v. IP Address 98.209.250.195 (Case No. 2:17-cv-10449)
v. IP Address 98.224.223.170 (Case No. 2:17-cv-10450)
v. IP Address 99.37.173.71 (Case No. 2:17-cv-10451)
v. IP Address 68.40.27.99 (Case No. 2:17-cv-10441)

Cases Filed in the New Jersey District Court (38)
Attorney: Patrick Joseph Cerillo (“Pat Cerillo”)

MALIBU MEDIA, LLC v. JOHN DOE (Case No. 2:17-cv-01246, 2:17-cv-01251, 2:17-cv-01237, 2:17-cv-01240)
v. JOHN DOE SUBSCRIBER ASSIGNED IP ADDRESS 24.0.207.93 (Case No. 2:17-cv-01239)
v. JOHN DOE SUBSCRIBER ASSIGNED IP ADDRESS 100.1.206.172 (Case No. 2:17-cv-01172)
v. JOHN DOE SUBSCRIBER ASSIGNED IP ADDRESS 108.167.50 (Case No. 2:17-cv-01185)
v. JOHN DOE SUBSCRIBER ASSIGNED IP ADDRESS 108.5.52.134 (Case No. 2:17-cv-01182)
v. JOHN DOE SUBSCRIBER ASSIGNED IP ADDRESS 108.53.147.136 (Case No. 2:17-cv-01183)
v. JOHN DOE SUBSCRIBER ASSIGNED IP ADDRESS 108.53.252.54 (Case No. 2:17-cv-01193)
v. JOHN DOE SUBSCRIBER ASSIGNED IP ADDRESS 173.3.124.255 (Case No. 2:17-cv-01228)
v. JOHN DOE SUBSCRIBER ASSIGNED IP ADDRESS 173.3.54.44 (Case No. 2:17-cv-01232)
v. JOHN DOE SUBSCRIBER ASSIGNED IP ADDRESS 173.63.249.136 (Case No. 2:17-cv-01233)
v. JOHN DOE SUBSCRIBER ASSIGNED IP ADDRESS 173.70.197.251 (Case No. 2:17-cv-01234)
v. JOHN DOE SUBSCRIBER ASSIGNED IP ADDRESS 173.70.93.127 (Case No. 2:17-cv-01236)
v. JOHN DOE SUBSCRIBER ASSIGNED IP ADDRESS 67.82.37.90 (Case No. 2:17-cv-01252)
v. JOHN DOE SUBSCRIBER ASSIGNED IP ADDRESS 67.83.64.114 (Case No. 2:17-cv-01271)
v. JOHN DOE SUBSCRIBER ASSIGNED IP ADDRESS 67.83.77.86 (Case No. 2:17-cv-01272)
v. JOHN DOE SUBSCRIBER ASSIGNED IP ADDRESS 69.117.66.98 (Case No. 3:17-cv-01261)
v. JOHN DOE SUBSCRIBER ASSIGNED IP ADDRESS 69.118.248.215 (Case No. 2:17-cv-01273)
v. JOHN DOE SUBSCRIBER ASSIGNED IP ADDRESS 69.122.18.0 (Case No. 2:17-cv-01275)
v. JOHN DOE SUBSCRIBER ASSIGNED IP ADDRESS 69.141.237.206 (Case No. 3:17-cv-01262)
v. JOHN DOE SUBSCRIBER ASSIGNED IP ADDRESS 72.82.239.77 (Case No. 3:17-cv-01265)
v. JOHN DOE SUBSCRIBER ASSIGNED IP ADDRESS 72.88.211.121 (Case No. 2:17-cv-01279)
v. JOHN DOE SUBSCRIBER ASSIGNED IP ADDRESS 73.10.138.235 (Case No. 3:17-cv-01266)
v. JOHN DOE subscriber assigned IP address 73.199.240.186 (Case No. 3:17-cv-01229)
v. JOHN DOE subscriber assigned IP address 96.248.95.37 (Case No. 3:17-cv-01268)
v. JOHN DOE SUBSCRIBER IP ADDRESS 108.35.167.198 (Case No. 2:17-cv-01180)
v. JOHN DOE SUBSCRIBER IP ADDRESS 108.53.193.228 (Case No. 2:17-cv-01188)
v. JOHN DOE, SUBSCRIBER ASSIGNED IP ADDRESS 100.8.116.23 (Case No. 2:17-cv-01179)
v. JOHN DOE SUBSCRIBER ASSIGNED IP ADDRESS 69.124.120.156 (Case No. 2:17-cv-01276)
v. JOHN DOE SUBSCRIBER ASSIGNED IP ADDRESS 71.172.15.229 (Case No. 2:17-cv-01277)
v. JOHN DOE SUBSCRIBER ASSIGNED IP ADDRESS 73.160.218.175 (Case No. 2:17-cv-01307)
v. JOHN DOE SUBSCRIBER ASSIGNED IP ADDRESS 73.194.168.244 (Case No. 2:17-cv-01310)
v. JOHN DOE SUBSCRIBER ASSIGNED IP ADDRESS 73.197.106.118 (Case No. 2:17-cv-01315)
v. JOHN DOE SUBSCRIBER ASSIGNED IP ADDRESS 73.248.226.136 (Case No. 2:17-cv-01317)
v. JOHN DOE SUBSCRIBER ASSIGNED IP ADDRESS 76.116.108.250 (Case No. 2:17-cv-01319)
v. JOHN DOE SUBSCRIBER ASSIGNED IP ADDRESS 96.57.99.138 (Case No. 2:17-cv-01321)

Cases Filed in the New York Eastern District Court (10)
Attorney: Jacqueline M. James (“Jackie James”) of The James Law Firm, PPLC

Malibu Media, LLC v. DOE (Case Nos. 2:17-cv-01079, 2:17-cv-01078, 2:17-cv-01084, 2:17-cv-01077, 2:17-cv-01083, 2:17-cv-01076, 2:17-cv-01081, 2:17-cv-01080, 2:17-cv-01075, 2:17-cv-01082)

Cases Filed in the New York Southern District Court (30)
Attorney: Jacqueline M. James (“Jackie James”) of The James Law Firm, PPLC

Malibu Media, LLC v. Doe (Case Nos. 1:17-cv-00983, 1:17-cv-00985, 1:17-cv-00987, 1:17-cv-00988, 1:17-cv-00989, 1:17-cv-00992, 1:17-cv-00994, 1:17-cv-00995, 1:17-cv-01065, 1:17-cv-01067, 1:17-cv-01068, 1:17-cv-01069, 1:17-cv-01070, 1:17-cv-01072, 1:17-cv-01074, 1:17-cv-01075, 1:17-cv-01076, 1:17-cv-01078, 1:17-cv-01088, 1:17-cv-01094, 1:17-cv-01095, 1:17-cv-01096, 1:17-cv-01097, 1:17-cv-01098, 1:17-cv-01099, 1:17-cv-01100, 1:17-cv-01101, 1:17-cv-01102, 7:17-cv-00981, 7:17-cv-00982)

Have you read enough? Book Now to get help. > > >

Cases Filed in the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court (8)
Attorney: A. Jordan Rushie (“Jordan Rushie”) of Flynn Wirkus Young PC / Rushie Law

MALIBU MEDIA, LLC v. JOHN DOE (Case Nos. 2:17-cv-00662, 2:17-cv-00509, 2:17-cv-00506, 2:17-cv-00510, 2:17-cv-00508, 2:17-cv-00507, 2:17-cv-00512, 2:17-cv-00511)

Cases Filed in the Texas Southern District Court (42)
Attorney: Andrew Darshan Kumar (“Andrew Kumar”) and Michael J. Lowenberg (“Mike Lowenberg”) of the Lowenberg Law Firm

Malibu Media, LLC v. Doe (Case Nos. 4:17-cv-00413, 4:17-cv-00415, Case No. 4:17-cv-00417, 4:17-cv-00418, 4:17-cv-00420, 4:17-cv-00421, 4:17-cv-00422, 4:17-cv-00423, 4:17-cv-00424, 4:17-cv-00425, 4:17-cv-00465, 4:17-cv-00466, 4:17-cv-00468, 4:17-cv-00469, 4:17-cv-00470, 4:17-cv-00471, 4:17-cv-00472, 4:17-cv-00473, 4:17-cv-00474, 4:17-cv-00475, 4:17-cv-00476, 4:17-cv-00477, 4:17-cv-00478, 4:17-cv-00479, 4:17-cv-00480, 4:17-cv-00481, 4:17-cv-00482, 4:17-cv-00483, 4:17-cv-00484, 4:17-cv-00485, 4:17-cv-00486, 4:17-cv-00487, 4:17-cv-00488, 4:17-cv-00489, 4:17-cv-00490, 4:17-cv-00491, 4:17-cv-00492, 4:17-cv-00493, 4:17-cv-00494, 4:17-cv-00495, 4:17-cv-00497, and 4:17-cv-00498.)

Cases Filed in the Virginia Eastern District Court (3)
Attorney: John Carlin Decker, II (“John Decker”) of the Law Office of John C. Decker II
5207 Dalby Lane, Burke, VA 22015 (John is still using his Verizon e-mail when he files the lawsuits — [email protected])

Malibu Media, LLC v. Doe (Case Nos. 1:17-cv-00192, 1:17-cv-00193, 1:17-cv-00194)

—
CONTACT FORM: If you have a question or comment about what I have written, and you want to keep it *for my eyes only*, please feel free to use the form below. The information you post will be e-mailed to me, and I will be happy to respond.