“He loves me,” “he loves me not.” It can go either way in the Central District of California consolidations.

UPDATE (10/10/2012): “He loved her not.” All 33 cases severed and dismissed. Congratulations to all the Cashman Law Firm, PLLC clients who have been dismissed from these lawsuits. “He Loves Me, He Loves Me Not.” It appears as if us attorneys are playing a “he loves me, he loves me not” game watching Judge Klausner’s … Read more

Why California Malibu Media Case Consolidations are Bad.

malibu-media-case-consolidations

Case consolidations (until now) happened when a federal judge lumped together different cases which all suffered from the same flaws, e.g., improper jurisdiction, improper joinder, etc. and they dismissed them all in one order. This was a good thing! However, when a troll-friendly judge consolidates a plaintiff attorneys case to keep the cases alive, but to manage the dockets, e.g., to avoid inconsistent rulings, while this in itself is a good thing for the court (and for justice), it is a bad thing for the defendants accused in those copyright infringement cases.

New Arizona Rule: You are only properly joined with those you upload to or download from.

Arizona federal courts now apply FRCP Joinder Rule to apply only to bittorrent swarms the defendant participated in.

Malibu Media Copyright Troll – The “New Kids on the Block”.

malibu-media-case-consolidations

Meet your new Malibu Media copyright troll. There seems to be a new production company who has decided that it is a better business model for them to start suing internet users (e.g., copyright trolling) rather than selling their cheap flicks on the internet one by one. The company name is Malibu Media, LLC, and … Read more

Can Ira Siegel no longer accept settlements for his dismissed cases?

Please allow me to extend a warm congratulations to the Cashman Law Firm, PLLC defendants (and all others) who have been dismissed from the New Sensations, Inc. v. Does 1-1,474 (Case No. 3:11-cv-02770) case and the Patrick Collins, Inc. v. Does 1-2590 (Case No. 3:11-cv-02766) case, both in the U.S. District Court for the Northern … Read more

Exit mobile version