Motion to Quash (FL)

Within the context of motions to quash and copyright infringement “copyright troll” cases, I have very strong opinions that motions to quash [specifically, in John Doe based copyright infringement lawsuits filed in federal courts] do *NOT* provide the anonymity accused defendants seek.

Within the context of motions to quash in Strike 3 Holdings Florida Bill of Discovery cases filed in the Miami-Dade County Court (and soon in Arizona Maricopa County Strike 3 cases), I also believe that they do not work, but for different reasons.*

Based on what Florida licensed attorneys have described to me and demonstrated to me, Strike 3 Holdings, LLC reacts to the attorney filing a motion to quash with a solicitation to settle the claims against them or face an immediate lawsuit in the federal court in the state in which the defendant lives.

* I am not licensed to practice Florida law, and so I cannot provide legal advice on whether a motion to quash is a good idea or not.  Rather, when asked by a client, I would be happy to share what was told to me, but I will always advise that the potential client contact a Florida licensed attorney before deciding whether or not to file a motion to quash in the Miami-Dade County, Florida Strike 3 Holdings, LLC Bill of Discovery cases.